Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBSIX vs JVMCX
FBSIX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FBSIX vs JVMCX
Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value R6
Price$39.15
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets771.32M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$28.07
Change-$0.12 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.36B
FBSIX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBSIX vs. JVMCX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBSIX is a Hold and JVMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.4B vs. FBSIX (771M). FBSIX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FBSIX (1.42) vs JVMCX (0.00). FBSIX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FBSIX (12 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FBSIX (0.59). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FBSIX (37.84). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBSIX: JVMCX (1000) vs FBSIX (1000000). FBSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.15 vs. JVMCX (-2.32). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 45.93 vs. FBSIX (39.02).
| FBSIX | JVMCX | FBSIX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.85 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.86 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.317 | 11.423 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 771M | 24.4B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.15 | -2.32 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.30 | 27.17 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.02 | 45.93 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.97 | 42.32 | 5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers