FBT vs RARE ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBT is a StrongBuy and RARE is a Hold.
RARE | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FBT | RARE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 10 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 80% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GCVUX | 23.66 | 0.02 | +0.08% |
| Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts R6 | |||
| QSMLX | 17.01 | -0.04 | -0.23% |
| AQR Small Cap Multi-Style I | |||
| WPSGX | 53.32 | -0.16 | -0.30% |
| AB Concentrated Growth Advisor | |||
| VFFSX | 245.65 | -0.85 | -0.34% |
| Vanguard 500 Index Institutional Select | |||
| LAMFX | 20.53 | -0.09 | -0.44% |
| Lord Abbett Dividend Growth F | |||
FBT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBT has been loosely correlated with IQV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FBT jumps, then IQV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FBT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBT | 100% | +1.46% | ||
| IQV - FBT | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| ILMN - FBT | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.28% | ||
| RARE - FBT | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.79% | ||
| CRL - FBT | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.61% | ||
| AGIO - FBT | 57% Loosely correlated | +3.52% | ||
More | ||||
RARE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RARE has been loosely correlated with AGIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RARE jumps, then AGIO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RARE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RARE | 100% | +1.79% | ||
| AGIO - RARE | 51% Loosely correlated | +3.52% | ||
| DNLI - RARE | 50% Loosely correlated | +4.60% | ||
| SRPT - RARE | 47% Loosely correlated | +3.24% | ||
| VCYT - RARE | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.86% | ||
| NTLA - RARE | 46% Loosely correlated | +5.14% | ||
More | ||||