Ad is loading...
FBTAX vs FHCCX
FBTAX vs FHCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. FHCCX commentary
Mar 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a StrongBuy and FHCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHCCX has more cash in the bank: 3.96B vs. FBTAX (1.5B). FBTAX pays higher dividends than FHCCX: FBTAX (1.02) vs FHCCX (0.00). FBTAX was incepted earlier than FHCCX: FBTAX (24 years) vs FHCCX (27 years). FBTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. FHCCX (47.00). FBTAX (0) and FHCCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.54 vs. FHCCX (-15.09). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.47 vs. FHCCX (-5.55).
| FBTAX | FHCCX | FBTAX / FHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.764 | 1.360 | -130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.5B | 3.96B | 38% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.54 | -15.09 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.20 | -8.65 | -222% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.47 | -5.55 | -63% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.82 | 13.21 | -6% |