Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTAX vs FHCCX
FBTAX vs FHCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. FHCCX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Buy and FHCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHCCX has more cash in the bank: 3.33B vs. FBTAX (1.28B). FBTAX pays higher dividends than FHCCX: FBTAX (3.05) vs FHCCX (0.00). FBTAX was incepted earlier than FHCCX: FBTAX (24 years) vs FHCCX (28 years). FHCCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). FBTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. FHCCX (37.00). FBTAX (0) and FHCCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.14 vs. FHCCX (-18.91). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : -8.77 vs. FHCCX (-16.33).
| FBTAX | FHCCX | FBTAX / FHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.69 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.69 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.573 | -4.720 | 54% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.28B | 3.33B | 38% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.14 | -18.91 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.29 | 1.89 | 2,393% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.77 | -16.33 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.12 | 2.34 | -261% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement