Ad is loading...
FBTAX vs FHCCX
FBTAX vs FHCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. FHCCX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Buy and FHCCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHCCX has more cash in the bank: 4.07B vs. FBTAX (1.56B). FBTAX pays higher dividends than FHCCX: FBTAX (1.02) vs FHCCX (0.00). FBTAX was incepted earlier than FHCCX: FBTAX (24 years) vs FHCCX (27 years). FBTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. FHCCX (47.00). FBTAX (0) and FHCCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.60 vs. FHCCX (-7.41). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : 7.41 vs. FHCCX (-3.60).
| FBTAX | FHCCX | FBTAX / FHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.772 | 5.721 | -13% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.56B | 4.07B | 38% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.60 | -7.41 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.57 | -4.43 | -419% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.41 | -3.60 | -206% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.06 | 25.56 | 35% |