Ad is loading...
FBTAX vs FHCCX
FBTAX vs FHCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. FHCCX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Buy and FHCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHCCX has more cash in the bank: 3.74B vs. FBTAX (1.39B). FBTAX pays higher dividends than FHCCX: FBTAX (2.97) vs FHCCX (0.00). FBTAX was incepted earlier than FHCCX: FBTAX (24 years) vs FHCCX (27 years). FHCCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). FBTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. FHCCX (37.00). FBTAX (0) and FHCCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBTAX (-14.81) and FHCCX (-15.53) have marching annual gain over last year. FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : -12.93 vs. FHCCX (-13.66).
| FBTAX | FHCCX | FBTAX / FHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.69 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.69 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.002 | -3.874 | 361% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 3.74B | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.97 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.81 | -15.53 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.10 | -15.67 | -7% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.93 | -13.66 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.28 | 2.41 | -677% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers