Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTAX vs LHCAX
FBTAX vs LHCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. LHCAX commentary
Sep 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Hold and LHCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.46B vs. LHCAX (7.71M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than LHCAX: FBTAX (2.59) vs LHCAX (0.31). FBTAX was incepted earlier than LHCAX: FBTAX (25 years) vs LHCAX (6 years). LHCAX (3.34) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). LHCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FBTAX (73.00). FBTAX (6%) and LHCAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LHCAX: FBTAX (0) vs LHCAX (1500). FBTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.85 vs. LHCAX (-2.75). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : 11.64 vs. LHCAX (9.11).
| FBTAX | LHCAX | FBTAX / LHCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.03 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 3.34 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.134 | 3.392 | 476% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 7.71M | 18,965% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.59 | 0.31 | 836% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.85 | -2.75 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.35 | 16.26 | 211% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.64 | 9.11 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.42 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement