Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTAX vs LHCAX
FBTAX vs LHCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. LHCAX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Buy and LHCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.4B vs. LHCAX (7.55M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than LHCAX: FBTAX (2.74) vs LHCAX (0.33). FBTAX was incepted earlier than LHCAX: FBTAX (25 years) vs LHCAX (6 years). LHCAX (3.34) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). LHCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FBTAX (73.00). FBTAX (6%) and LHCAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LHCAX: FBTAX (0) vs LHCAX (1500). FBTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.79 vs. LHCAX (-4.97). LHCAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.39 vs. FBTAX (1.58).
| FBTAX | LHCAX | FBTAX / LHCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.03 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 3.34 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.364 | -0.157 | -6,619% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.4B | 7.55M | 18,535% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.74 | 0.33 | 819% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.79 | -4.97 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.33 | 7.13 | 313% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.58 | 4.39 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.97 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement