Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTAX vs LHCIX
FBTAX vs LHCIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. LHCIX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Buy and LHCIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.28B vs. LHCIX (7.33M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than LHCIX: FBTAX (3.05) vs LHCIX (0.61). FBTAX was incepted earlier than LHCIX: FBTAX (24 years) vs LHCIX (6 years). LHCIX (3.09) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). LHCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FBTAX (73.00). FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LHCIX: FBTAX (0) vs LHCIX (1000000). LHCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.81 vs. FBTAX (-7.14). LHCIX return over 5 years is better than : 10.43 vs. FBTAX (-8.77).
| FBTAX | LHCIX | FBTAX / LHCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.78 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 3.09 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.573 | -4.858 | 53% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.28B | 7.33M | 17,406% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.05 | 0.61 | 500% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.14 | -5.81 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.29 | 20.81 | 218% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.77 | 10.43 | -84% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers