Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTAX vs LHCIX
FBTAX vs LHCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. LHCIX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Hold and LHCIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.46B vs. LHCIX (7.64M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than LHCIX: FBTAX (2.59) vs LHCIX (0.56). FBTAX was incepted earlier than LHCIX: FBTAX (25 years) vs LHCIX (6 years). LHCIX (3.09) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). LHCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FBTAX (73.00). FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LHCIX: FBTAX (0) vs LHCIX (1000000). FBTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.29 vs. LHCIX (-2.92). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.86 vs. LHCIX (3.59).
| FBTAX | LHCIX | FBTAX / LHCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.78 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 3.09 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.134 | 1.757 | 918% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 7.64M | 19,139% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.59 | 0.56 | 465% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.29 | -2.92 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.75 | 25.21 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.86 | 3.59 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.83 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement