Ad is loading...
FBTAX vs LHCOX
FBTAX vs LHCOX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. LHCOX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Buy and LHCOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.56B vs. LHCOX (8.37M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than LHCOX: FBTAX (1.02) vs LHCOX (0.00). FBTAX was incepted earlier than LHCOX: FBTAX (24 years) vs LHCOX (5 years). FBTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. LHCOX (74.00). FBTAX (0) and LHCOX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.20 vs. FBTAX (-4.17). LHCOX return over 5 years is better than : 18.55 vs. FBTAX (-3.57).
| FBTAX | LHCOX | FBTAX / LHCOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.116 | 0.309 | -1,332% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.56B | 8.37M | 18,583% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.17 | 8.20 | -51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.00 | 12.49 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.57 | 18.55 | -19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.14 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...