Ad is loading...
FBTAX vs LHCSX
FBTAX vs LHCSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. LHCSX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Buy and LHCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. LHCSX (7.21M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than LHCSX: FBTAX (2.97) vs LHCSX (0.34). FBTAX was incepted earlier than LHCSX: FBTAX (24 years) vs LHCSX (6 years). LHCSX (3.53) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). LHCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FBTAX (73.00). FBTAX (0) and LHCSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.53 vs. FBTAX (-10.26). LHCSX return over 5 years is better than : 8.69 vs. FBTAX (-10.50).
| FBTAX | LHCSX | FBTAX / LHCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.03 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 3.53 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.408 | -7.937 | 119% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 7.21M | 19,285% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.97 | 0.34 | 879% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.26 | -3.53 | 291% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.25 | 1.28 | 645% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.50 | 8.69 | -121% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.79 | N/A | - |