Ad is loading...
FBTAX vs LHCVX
FBTAX vs LHCVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. LHCVX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Buy and LHCVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.56B vs. LHCVX (8.37M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than LHCVX: FBTAX (1.02) vs LHCVX (0.00). FBTAX was incepted earlier than LHCVX: FBTAX (24 years) vs LHCVX (5 years). FBTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. LHCVX (74.00). FBTAX (0) and LHCVX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.97 vs. FBTAX (-4.17). LHCVX return over 5 years is better than : 19.39 vs. FBTAX (-3.57).
| FBTAX | LHCVX | FBTAX / LHCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.116 | 1.029 | -400% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.56B | 8.37M | 18,583% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.17 | 8.97 | -46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.00 | 13.29 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.57 | 19.39 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.14 | N/A | - |