Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTAX vs LHCVX
FBTAX vs LHCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. LHCVX commentary
Aug 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Buy and LHCVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.4B vs. LHCVX (7.33M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than LHCVX: FBTAX (2.74) vs LHCVX (0.60). FBTAX was incepted earlier than LHCVX: FBTAX (25 years) vs LHCVX (6 years). LHCVX (2.99) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). LHCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FBTAX (73.00). FBTAX (0) and LHCVX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.79 vs. FBTAX (-3.49). LHCVX return over 5 years is better than : 1.56 vs. FBTAX (-2.98).
| FBTAX | LHCVX | FBTAX / LHCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.68 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 2.99 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.431 | -3.500 | -184% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.4B | 7.33M | 19,081% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.74 | 0.60 | 458% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.49 | -0.79 | 442% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.77 | 6.74 | 338% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.98 | 1.56 | -191% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.06 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement