Ad is loading...
FBTAX vs LHCVX
FBTAX vs LHCVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. LHCVX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Buy and LHCVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. LHCVX (8.73M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than LHCVX: FBTAX (1.02) vs LHCVX (0.00). FBTAX was incepted earlier than LHCVX: FBTAX (24 years) vs LHCVX (5 years). FBTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. LHCVX (74.00). FBTAX (0) and LHCVX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.17 vs. LHCVX (17.41). LHCVX return over 5 years is better than : 27.22 vs. FBTAX (3.72).
| FBTAX | LHCVX | FBTAX / LHCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.059 | 12.622 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 8.73M | 19,913% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.17 | 17.41 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.79 | 5.63 | 245% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.72 | 27.22 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.50 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...