Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTAX vs LHCVX
FBTAX vs LHCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. LHCVX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Hold and LHCVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. LHCVX (8.85M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than LHCVX: FBTAX (2.16) vs LHCVX (0.50). FBTAX was incepted earlier than LHCVX: FBTAX (25 years) vs LHCVX (6 years). LHCVX (2.99) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). LHCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FBTAX (51.00). FBTAX (0) and LHCVX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.98 vs. LHCVX (14.62). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.88 vs. LHCVX (10.97).
| FBTAX | LHCVX | FBTAX / LHCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.68 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 2.99 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.831 | 17.705 | 231% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 8.85M | 19,670% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.16 | 0.50 | 429% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.98 | 14.62 | 219% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.86 | 33.29 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.88 | 10.97 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.54 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement