Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTAX vs RYHCX
FBTAX vs RYHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. RYHCX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Buy and RYHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.46B vs. RYHCX (29.8M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than RYHCX: FBTAX (2.59) vs RYHCX (0.00). FBTAX was incepted earlier than RYHCX: FBTAX (25 years) vs RYHCX (24 years). RYHCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). RYHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 236.00 vs. FBTAX (73.00). FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYHCX: FBTAX (0) vs RYHCX (2500). FBTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.11 vs. RYHCX (-6.08). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : 8.83 vs. RYHCX (4.35).
| FBTAX | RYHCX | FBTAX / RYHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 2.38 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 2.43 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.884 | 3.472 | 429% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 29.8M | 4,906% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.59 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.11 | -6.08 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.33 | 13.08 | 293% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.83 | 4.35 | 203% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.49 | -1.78 | -701% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement