Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTCX vs JNGLX
FBTCX vs JNGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTCX vs. JNGLX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTCX is a Buy and JNGLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JNGLX has more cash in the bank: 4.29B vs. FBTCX (1.4B). FBTCX pays higher dividends than JNGLX: FBTCX (2.67) vs JNGLX (0.36). FBTCX was incepted earlier than JNGLX: FBTCX (25 years) vs JNGLX (27 years). FBTCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than JNGLX (0.80). FBTCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. JNGLX (35.00). FBTCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JNGLX: FBTCX (0) vs JNGLX (2500). FBTCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.18 vs. JNGLX (-15.79). JNGLX return over 5 years is better than : 0.37 vs. FBTCX (-13.69).
| FBTCX | JNGLX | FBTCX / JNGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.80 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.80 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.841 | -3.815 | -127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.4B | 4.29B | 33% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.67 | 0.36 | 744% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.18 | -15.79 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.04 | 2.77 | 579% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.69 | 0.37 | -3,666% |
| Returns for 10 years | -14.21 | 7.64 | -186% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers