Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTCX vs SHSAX
FBTCX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTCX vs. SHSAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTCX is a Hold and SHSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.56B vs. FBTCX (1.74B). FBTCX pays higher dividends than SHSAX: FBTCX (2.12) vs SHSAX (0.21). FBTCX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: FBTCX (25 years) vs SHSAX (26 years). FBTCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than SHSAX (1.09). FBTCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. SHSAX (43.00). FBTCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHSAX: FBTCX (0) vs SHSAX (1000). FBTCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.88 vs. SHSAX (-0.69). FBTCX return over 5 years is better than : 7.31 vs. SHSAX (-7.94).
| FBTCX | SHSAX | FBTCX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 1.09 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 1.09 | 157% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.915 | 6.502 | 614% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 6.56B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.12 | 0.21 | 991% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.88 | -0.69 | -4,324% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.76 | 3.36 | 1,750% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.31 | -7.94 | -92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.17 | 27.31 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement