Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTCX vs SHSAX
FBTCX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTCX vs. SHSAX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTCX is a Buy and SHSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.04B vs. FBTCX (1.4B). FBTCX pays higher dividends than SHSAX: FBTCX (2.67) vs SHSAX (0.24). FBTCX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: FBTCX (25 years) vs SHSAX (26 years). FBTCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than SHSAX (1.09). FBTCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. SHSAX (27.00). FBTCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHSAX: FBTCX (0) vs SHSAX (1000). FBTCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.18 vs. SHSAX (-18.59). FBTCX return over 5 years is better than : -13.69 vs. SHSAX (-19.22).
| FBTCX | SHSAX | FBTCX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 1.09 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 1.09 | 157% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.841 | -9.033 | -54% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.4B | 6.04B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.67 | 0.24 | 1,134% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.18 | -18.59 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.04 | -9.98 | -161% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.69 | -19.22 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | -14.21 | 0.89 | -1,604% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement