Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTCX vs SHSAX
FBTCX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTCX vs. SHSAX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTCX is a Buy and SHSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.34B vs. FBTCX (1.61B). FBTCX pays higher dividends than SHSAX: FBTCX (2.29) vs SHSAX (0.22). FBTCX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: FBTCX (25 years) vs SHSAX (26 years). FBTCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than SHSAX (1.09). FBTCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. SHSAX (43.00). FBTCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHSAX: FBTCX (0) vs SHSAX (1000). FBTCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.86 vs. SHSAX (-11.25). FBTCX return over 5 years is better than : -4.51 vs. SHSAX (-13.16).
| FBTCX | SHSAX | FBTCX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 1.09 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 1.09 | 157% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.398 | 0.464 | 5,038% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.61B | 6.34B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.29 | 0.22 | 1,030% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.86 | -11.25 | -25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.43 | 6.24 | 728% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.51 | -13.16 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.16 | 24.18 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement