Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTDX vs JNGLX
FBTDX vs JNGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTDX vs. JNGLX commentary
Oct 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTDX is a Hold and JNGLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JNGLX has more cash in the bank: 4.57B vs. FBTDX (902M). JNGLX pays higher dividends than FBTDX: JNGLX (0.33) vs FBTDX (0.00). FBTDX was incepted earlier than JNGLX: FBTDX (12 years) vs JNGLX (27 years). FBTDX (1.78) is less costly to investors than JNGLX (0.80). JNGLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FBTDX (21.87). FBTDX has a lower initial minimum investment than JNGLX: FBTDX (1000) vs JNGLX (2500). FBTDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.06 vs. JNGLX (-7.15). JNGLX return over 5 years is better than : 9.51 vs. FBTDX (-16.92).
| FBTDX | JNGLX | FBTDX / JNGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.80 | 221% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.80 | 223% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.299 | 10.075 | 311% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 902M | 4.57B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.33 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.06 | -7.15 | -43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.74 | 22.97 | 217% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.92 | 9.51 | -178% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.54 | 39.52 | -34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement