Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTDX vs VGHCX
FBTDX vs VGHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTDX vs. VGHCX commentary
Sep 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTDX is a Buy and VGHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VGHCX has more cash in the bank: 34.3B vs. FBTDX (785M). VGHCX pays higher dividends than FBTDX: VGHCX (0.87) vs FBTDX (0.00). FBTDX was incepted earlier than VGHCX: FBTDX (12 years) vs VGHCX (41 years). FBTDX (1.81) is less costly to investors than VGHCX (0.37). VGHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FBTDX (21.87). FBTDX has a lower initial minimum investment than VGHCX: FBTDX (1000) vs VGHCX (3000). FBTDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.35 vs. VGHCX (-23.14). VGHCX return over 5 years is better than : -15.97 vs. FBTDX (-20.45).
| FBTDX | VGHCX | FBTDX / VGHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.37 | 486% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.37 | 489% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.151 | -1.491 | -882% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 785M | 34.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.87 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.35 | -23.14 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.19 | -8.55 | -353% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.45 | -15.97 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | -31.56 | -18.21 | 173% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement