Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTDX vs VGHCX
FBTDX vs VGHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTDX vs. VGHCX commentary
Aug 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTDX is a Buy and VGHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VGHCX has more cash in the bank: 34.3B vs. FBTDX (732M). VGHCX pays higher dividends than FBTDX: VGHCX (0.91) vs FBTDX (0.00). FBTDX was incepted earlier than VGHCX: FBTDX (11 years) vs VGHCX (41 years). FBTDX (1.81) is less costly to investors than VGHCX (0.37). VGHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FBTDX (21.87). FBTDX has a lower initial minimum investment than VGHCX: FBTDX (1000) vs VGHCX (3000). FBTDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.88 vs. VGHCX (-25.35). VGHCX return over 5 years is better than : -22.64 vs. FBTDX (-29.38).
| FBTDX | VGHCX | FBTDX / VGHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.37 | 486% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.37 | 489% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.822 | -7.249 | -67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 732M | 34.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.91 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.88 | -25.35 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.33 | -19.98 | -62% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.38 | -22.64 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | -39.88 | -28.14 | 142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement