Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTDX vs VGHCX
FBTDX vs VGHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTDX vs. VGHCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTDX is a Hold and VGHCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VGHCX has more cash in the bank: 37.5B vs. FBTDX (1B). VGHCX pays higher dividends than FBTDX: VGHCX (0.80) vs FBTDX (0.00). FBTDX was incepted earlier than VGHCX: FBTDX (12 years) vs VGHCX (42 years). FBTDX (1.78) is less costly to investors than VGHCX (0.37). VGHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FBTDX (21.87). FBTDX has a lower initial minimum investment than VGHCX: FBTDX (1000) vs VGHCX (3000). FBTDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.47 vs. VGHCX (1.08). VGHCX return over 5 years is better than : -6.87 vs. FBTDX (-7.83).
| FBTDX | VGHCX | FBTDX / VGHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.37 | 478% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.37 | 481% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 46.218 | 11.943 | 387% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1B | 37.5B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.80 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.47 | 1.08 | 2,636% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.48 | -3.63 | -1,665% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.83 | -6.87 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | -7.10 | -10.29 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement