Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBZ vs FLLA
FBZ vs FLLA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBZ vs. FLLA commentary
Jul 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBZ is a Hold and FLLA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLLA has more net assets: 35M vs. FBZ (6.91M). FBZ has a higher annual dividend yield than FLLA: FBZ (29.591) vs FLLA (25.704). FBZ was incepted earlier than FLLA: FBZ (14 years) vs FLLA (7 years). FLLA (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than FBZ (0.80). FBZ has a higher turnover FLLA (14.31) vs FLLA (14.31).
| FBZ | FLLA | FBZ / FLLA | |
| Gain YTD | 29.591 | 25.704 | 115% |
| Net Assets | 6.91M | 35M | 20% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.19 | 421% |
| Turnover | 63.00 | 14.31 | 440% |
| Yield | 3.80 | 5.32 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FBZ | FLLA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 85% | 15 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FBZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBZ has been loosely correlated with XP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FBZ jumps, then XP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FBZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBZ | 100% | N/A | ||
| XP - FBZ | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| INTR - FBZ | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| STNE - FBZ | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| PAGS - FBZ | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| NU - FBZ | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.08% |
FLLA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLLA has been loosely correlated with CCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLLA jumps, then CCU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLLA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLLA | 100% | -0.15% | ||
| CCU - FLLA | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| OMAB - FLLA | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.96% | ||
| ECL - FLLA | 17% Poorly correlated | +1.44% | ||
| AC - FLLA | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.67% | ||
| LTM - FLLA | -1% Poorly correlated | -1.18% |