Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
FBZ vs ILF
FBZ vs ILF Comparison
Open Charts FBZ vs ILF
First Trust Brazil AlphaDEX® ETF
Price$10.54
Change-$0.08 (-0.75%)
Volume$794
CapitalizationN/A
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Price$24.09
Change-$0.13 (-0.54%)
Volume$697.46K
CapitalizationN/A
FBZ vs ILF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBZ vs. ILF commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBZ is a Sell and ILF is a StrongSell.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILF has more net assets: 1.3B vs. FBZ (5.83M). FBZ has a higher annual dividend yield than ILF: FBZ (-11.484) vs ILF (-14.902). FBZ was incepted earlier than ILF: FBZ (14 years) vs ILF (23 years). FBZ has a higher turnover ILF (24.00) vs ILF (24.00).
| FBZ | ILF | FBZ / ILF | |
| Gain YTD | -11.484 | -14.902 | 77% |
| Net Assets | 5.83M | 1.3B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 55.00 | 24.00 | 229% |
| Yield | 4.11 | 4.71 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FBZ | ILF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 85% | 11 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FBZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBZ has been loosely correlated with XP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FBZ jumps, then XP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FBZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBZ | 100% | -0.76% | ||
| XP - FBZ | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| INTR - FBZ | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| STNE - FBZ | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.11% | ||
| PAGS - FBZ | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.30% | ||
| NU - FBZ | 44% Loosely correlated | -7.44% |
ILF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | 100% | -0.54% | ||
| ITUB - ILF | 72% Closely correlated | +0.85% | ||
| VALE - ILF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| SCCO - ILF | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| GGB - ILF | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.47% | ||
| BBD - ILF | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.28% | ||
More | ||||