FC
Price
$37.66
Change
+$0.52 (+1.40%)
Updated
Jan 31, 11:43 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
520.87M
54 days until earnings call
GHC
Price
$931.00
Change
-$1.11 (-0.12%)
Updated
Jan 31, 11:01 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.42B
21 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FC vs GHC

Header iconFC vs GHC Comparison
Open Charts FC vs GHCBanner chart's image
Franklin Covey
Price$37.66
Change+$0.52 (+1.40%)
Volume$100
Capitalization520.87M
Graham Holdings
Price$931.00
Change-$1.11 (-0.12%)
Volume$613
Capitalization3.42B
FC vs GHC Comparison Chart
Loading...
FC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FC vs. GHC commentary
Jan 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FC is a Buy and GHC is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 31, 2025
Stock price -- (FC: $37.15 vs. GHC: $932.11)
Brand notoriety: FC and GHC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FC: 118% vs. GHC: 114%
Market capitalization -- FC: $520.87M vs. GHC: $3.42B
FC [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $520.87M. GHC’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $3.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGHC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GHC is a better buy in the long-term than FC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GHC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GHC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FC is a better buy in the short-term than GHC.

Price Growth

FC (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +8.12% price change this week, while GHC (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was +2.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

FC is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2025.

GHC is expected to report earnings on Feb 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+0.31% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GHC($3.42B) has a higher market cap than FC($521M). FC has higher P/E ratio than GHC: FC (29.38) vs GHC (17.25). GHC YTD gains are higher at: 6.903 vs. FC (-1.144). GHC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 665M vs. FC (35.9M). GHC has more cash in the bank: 867M vs. FC (34M). FC has less debt than GHC: FC (13.2M) vs GHC (1.25B). GHC has higher revenues than FC: GHC (4.42B) vs FC (280M).
FCGHCFC / GHC
Capitalization521M3.42B15%
EBITDA35.9M665M5%
Gain YTD-1.1446.903-17%
P/E Ratio29.3817.25170%
Revenue280M4.42B6%
Total Cash34M867M4%
Total Debt13.2M1.25B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FC vs GHC: Fundamental Ratings
FC
GHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2210
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7934
SMR RATING
1..100
3381
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7543
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7974
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
29n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GHC's Valuation (30) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FC (82) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.

GHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FC (79) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.

FC's SMR Rating (33) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GHC (81) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that FC’s stock grew somewhat faster than GHC’s over the last 12 months.

GHC's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as FC (75) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew similarly to FC’s over the last 12 months.

GHC's P/E Growth Rating (74) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as FC (79) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew similarly to FC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCGHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BEQGX34.620.10
+0.29%
American Century Equity Growth Inv
NILIX13.68N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman International Sel I
SHSSX71.47N/A
N/A
BlackRock Health Sciences Opps Instl
DTSGX17.62N/A
N/A
Wilshire Small Company Growth Invmt
DRDCX25.46N/A
N/A
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend C

GHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GHC has been loosely correlated with LOPE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GHC jumps, then LOPE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GHC
1D Price
Change %
GHC100%
+1.34%
LOPE - GHC
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
MSA - GHC
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.09%
BCO - GHC
52%
Loosely correlated
+2.39%
EXPO - GHC
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.07%
CASS - GHC
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.91%
More