FC
Price
$36.37
Change
-$1.26 (-3.35%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
15 days until earnings call
GHC
Price
$905.86
Change
+$11.15 (+1.25%)
Updated
Dec 18, 12:32 PM (EDT)
65 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FC vs GHC

Header iconFC vs GHC Comparison
Open Charts FC vs GHCBanner chart's image
Franklin Covey
Price$36.37
Change-$1.26 (-3.35%)
Volume$300
CapitalizationN/A
Graham Holdings
Price$905.86
Change+$11.15 (+1.25%)
Volume$211
CapitalizationN/A
FC vs GHC Comparison Chart
Loading...
FC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FC vs. GHC commentary
Dec 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FC is a StrongBuy and GHC is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 18, 2024
Stock price -- (FC: $37.63 vs. GHC: $894.70)
Brand notoriety: FC and GHC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FC: 136% vs. GHC: 153%
Market capitalization -- FC: $520.87M vs. GHC: $3.42B
FC [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $520.87M. GHC’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $3.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGHC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GHC is a better buy in the long-term than FC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GHC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • GHC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FC is a better buy in the short-term than GHC.

Price Growth

FC (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +0.86% price change this week, while GHC (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -5.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

FC is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2025.

GHC is expected to report earnings on Feb 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-2.30% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GHC($3.42B) has a higher market cap than FC($521M). FC has higher P/E ratio than GHC: FC (29.38) vs GHC (17.25). GHC YTD gains are higher at: 29.623 vs. FC (-13.554). GHC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 665M vs. FC (35.9M). GHC has more cash in the bank: 867M vs. FC (34M). FC has less debt than GHC: FC (13.2M) vs GHC (1.25B). GHC has higher revenues than FC: GHC (4.42B) vs FC (280M).
FCGHCFC / GHC
Capitalization521M3.42B15%
EBITDA35.9M665M5%
Gain YTD-13.55429.623-46%
P/E Ratio29.3817.25170%
Revenue280M4.42B6%
Total Cash34M867M4%
Total Debt13.2M1.25B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FC vs GHC: Fundamental Ratings
FC
GHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6460
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9539
SMR RATING
1..100
3380
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5643
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8979
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GHC's Valuation (30) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FC (82) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.

GHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FC (95) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.

FC's SMR Rating (33) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GHC (80) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that FC’s stock grew somewhat faster than GHC’s over the last 12 months.

GHC's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as FC (56) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew similarly to FC’s over the last 12 months.

GHC's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as FC (89) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew similarly to FC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCGHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GGDPX13.16N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Intl Sm Cp Insghts P
TCBIX8.82-0.01
-0.11%
Covered Bridge I
BRWSX25.73-0.09
-0.35%
MFS Blended Research Growth Eq R2
PINTX10.76-0.07
-0.65%
Principal Overseas R3
AICFX59.14-4.90
-7.66%
American Funds Invmt Co of Amer F1

GHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GHC has been loosely correlated with UNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GHC jumps, then UNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GHC
1D Price
Change %
GHC100%
-2.12%
UNF - GHC
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.15%
RGP - GHC
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.64%
LOPE - GHC
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
EXPO - GHC
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
CASS - GHC
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
More