Ad is loading...
FCAL vs MUC
FCAL vs MUC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCAL vs. MUC commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCAL is a Hold and MUC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MUC has more net assets: 1.03B vs. FCAL (263M). MUC has a higher annual dividend yield than FCAL: MUC (-0.400) vs FCAL (-3.681). FCAL was incepted earlier than MUC: FCAL (8 years) vs MUC (27 years). FCAL (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than MUC (1.46). MUC has a higher turnover FCAL (41.00) vs FCAL (41.00).
| FCAL | MUC | FCAL / MUC | |
| Gain YTD | -3.681 | -0.400 | 920% |
| Net Assets | 263M | 1.03B | 25% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.46 | 45% |
| Turnover | 41.00 | 59.00 | 69% |
| Yield | 3.09 | 3.92 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 27 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCAL | MUC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 58% | 10 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers