Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCAMX vs FCQAX
FCAMX vs FCQAX Comparison
Open Charts FCAMX vs FCQAX
Franklin CA High Yield Municipal A1
Price$9.55
Change+$0.05 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.99B
Franklin CA High Yield Municipal A
Price$9.57
Change+$0.13 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.99B
FCAMX vs FCQAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCAMX vs. FCQAX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCAMX is a Hold and FCQAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCAMX (2.99B) and FCQAX (2.99B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCAMX (4.36) and FCQAX (4.20) have matching dividends . FCAMX was incepted earlier than FCQAX: FCAMX (32 years) vs FCQAX (7 years). FCQAX (0.80) is less costly to investors than FCAMX (0.65). FCAMX (10.33) and FCQAX (10.33) have comparable annual turnover. FCAMX (4%) and FCQAX (4%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FCAMX (1000) and FCQAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCAMX (-0.98) and FCQAX (-1.03) have marching annual gain over last year. FCAMX return over 5 years is better than : -1.40 vs. FCQAX (-2.03).
| FCAMX | FCQAX | FCAMX / FCQAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.80 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.80 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.506 | -0.605 | 84% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.99B | 2.99B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.36 | 4.20 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.98 | -1.03 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.02 | 7.68 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.40 | -2.03 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.91 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers