Ad is loading...
FCAMX vs FCQAX
FCAMX vs FCQAX Comparison
Open Charts FCAMX vs FCQAX
Franklin CA High Yield Municipal A1
Price$9.48
Change+$0.03 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.91B
Franklin CA High Yield Municipal A
Price$9.50
Change+$0.03 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.91B
FCAMX vs FCQAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCAMX vs. FCQAX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCAMX is a Hold and FCQAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCAMX (2.91B) and FCQAX (2.91B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCAMX (4.16) and FCQAX (4.00) have matching dividends . FCAMX was incepted earlier than FCQAX: FCAMX (32 years) vs FCQAX (7 years). FCQAX (0.84) is less costly to investors than FCAMX (0.69). FCAMX (10.93) and FCQAX (10.93) have comparable annual turnover. FCAMX (4%) and FCQAX (4%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FCAMX (1000) and FCQAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.14 vs. FCQAX (1.98). FCAMX return over 5 years is better than : 1.79 vs. FCQAX (1.29).
| FCAMX | FCQAX | FCAMX / FCQAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.84 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.84 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.560 | -2.590 | 99% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.91B | 2.91B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.16 | 4.00 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.14 | 1.98 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.26 | 1.91 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.79 | 1.29 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.95 | N/A | - |