Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCAMX vs FCQAX
FCAMX vs FCQAX Comparison
Open Charts FCAMX vs FCQAX
Franklin CA High Yield Municipal A1
Price$9.73
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.1B
Franklin CA High Yield Municipal A
Price$9.75
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.1B
FCAMX vs FCQAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCAMX vs. FCQAX commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCAMX is a Hold and FCQAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCAMX (3.1B) and FCQAX (3.1B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCAMX (4.27) and FCQAX (4.11) have matching dividends . FCAMX was incepted earlier than FCQAX: FCAMX (32 years) vs FCQAX (7 years). FCQAX (0.80) is less costly to investors than FCAMX (0.65). FCAMX (10.33) and FCQAX (10.33) have comparable annual turnover. FCAMX (4%) and FCQAX (4%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FCAMX (1000) and FCQAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.66 vs. FCQAX (1.50). FCAMX return over 5 years is better than : 1.61 vs. FCQAX (1.03).
| FCAMX | FCQAX | FCAMX / FCQAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.80 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.80 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.256 | 2.137 | 106% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.1B | 3.1B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.27 | 4.11 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.66 | 1.50 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.36 | 14.86 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.61 | 1.03 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.05 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers