Ad is loading...
FCAMX vs FKTFX
FCAMX vs FKTFX Comparison
Open Charts FCAMX vs FKTFX
Franklin CA High Yield Municipal A1
Price$9.48
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.91B
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A1
Price$6.59
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.44B
FCAMX vs FKTFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCAMX vs. FKTFX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCAMX is a Hold and FKTFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTFX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. FCAMX (2.91B). FCAMX pays higher dividends than FKTFX: FCAMX (4.16) vs FKTFX (3.67). FCAMX was incepted earlier than FKTFX: FCAMX (32 years) vs FKTFX (48 years). FCAMX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FKTFX (0.61). FKTFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.01 vs. FCAMX (10.93). FCAMX (4%) and FKTFX (4%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FCAMX (1000) and FKTFX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.14 vs. FKTFX (1.21). FCAMX return over 5 years is better than : 2.76 vs. FKTFX (-0.16).
| FCAMX | FKTFX | FCAMX / FKTFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.61 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.61 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 48 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.560 | -2.644 | 97% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.91B | 12.4B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.16 | 3.67 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.14 | 1.21 | 177% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.66 | 3.26 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.76 | -0.16 | -1,731% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.72 | 1.51 | 246% |