Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCAMX vs FTFQX
FCAMX vs FTFQX Comparison
Open Charts FCAMX vs FTFQX
Franklin CA High Yield Municipal A1
Price$9.47
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.96B
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A
Price$6.59
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.57B
FCAMX vs FTFQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCAMX vs. FTFQX commentary
Jul 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCAMX is a Hold and FTFQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTFQX has more cash in the bank: 12.6B vs. FCAMX (2.96B). FCAMX pays higher dividends than FTFQX: FCAMX (4.30) vs FTFQX (3.60). FCAMX was incepted earlier than FTFQX: FCAMX (32 years) vs FTFQX (7 years). FTFQX (0.76) is less costly to investors than FCAMX (0.69). FCAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.33 vs. FTFQX (7.96). FCAMX (4%) and FTFQX (4%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FCAMX (1000) and FTFQX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.07 vs. FTFQX (-0.81). FCAMX return over 5 years is better than : -1.50 vs. FTFQX (-4.16).
| FCAMX | FTFQX | FCAMX / FTFQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.76 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.76 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.586 | -1.772 | 89% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.96B | 12.6B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.30 | 3.60 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.07 | -0.81 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.51 | 3.71 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.50 | -4.16 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.35 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement