Ad is loading...
FCAMX vs FTFQX
FCAMX vs FTFQX Comparison
Open Charts FCAMX vs FTFQX
Franklin CA High Yield Municipal A1
Price$9.48
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.91B
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A
Price$6.60
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.44B
FCAMX vs FTFQX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCAMX vs. FTFQX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCAMX is a Hold and FTFQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTFQX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. FCAMX (2.91B). FCAMX pays higher dividends than FTFQX: FCAMX (4.16) vs FTFQX (3.50). FCAMX was incepted earlier than FTFQX: FCAMX (32 years) vs FTFQX (7 years). FTFQX (0.76) is less costly to investors than FCAMX (0.69). FTFQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.01 vs. FCAMX (10.93). FCAMX (4%) and FTFQX (4%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FCAMX (1000) and FTFQX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.14 vs. FTFQX (1.05). FCAMX return over 5 years is better than : 2.76 vs. FTFQX (-0.65).
| FCAMX | FTFQX | FCAMX / FTFQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.76 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.76 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.560 | -2.676 | 96% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.91B | 12.4B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.16 | 3.50 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.14 | 1.05 | 204% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.66 | 2.91 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.76 | -0.65 | -423% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.72 | N/A | - |