Ad is loading...
FCANX vs HBLCX
FCANX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FCANX vs HBLCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% C
Price$11.75
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.65B
FCANX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCANX vs. HBLCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCANX is a Buy and HBLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. FCANX (1.94B). HBLCX pays higher dividends than FCANX: HBLCX (2.67) vs FCANX (2.03). FCANX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FCANX (18 years) vs HBLCX (19 years). HBLCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FCANX (1.54). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FCANX (19.00). FCANX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: FCANX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). HBLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FCANX: HBLCX (2000) vs FCANX (500). FCANX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.74 vs. HBLCX (1.95). FCANX return over 5 years is better than : 14.75 vs. HBLCX (13.81).
| FCANX | HBLCX | FCANX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.64 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.64 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.028 | 1.272 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 1.94B | 11.7B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.03 | 2.67 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.74 | 1.95 | 243% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.83 | 6.40 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.75 | 13.81 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.82 | 23.61 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...