Ad is loading...
FCANX vs HBLCX
FCANX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FCANX vs HBLCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% C
Price$11.81
Change-$0.07 (-0.59%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.73
Change-$0.06 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCANX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
FCANX vs. HBLCX commentary
Sep 08, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCANX is a Buy and HBLCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. FCANX (2.03B). HBLCX pays higher dividends than FCANX: HBLCX (2.65) vs FCANX (1.80). FCANX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FCANX (17 years) vs HBLCX (18 years). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FCANX (22.00). FCANX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: FCANX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). HBLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FCANX: HBLCX (2000) vs FCANX (500). HBLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.92 vs. FCANX (10.95). FCANX (12.32) and HBLCX (12.13) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FCANX | HBLCX | FCANX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.625 | 6.703 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 2.03B | 12.5B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 2.65 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.95 | 12.92 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.22 | -4.32 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.32 | 12.13 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.68 | 27.88 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers