Ad is loading...
FCANX vs HBLCX
FCANX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FCANX vs HBLCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% C
Price$11.88
Change+$0.04 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.98B
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.26
Change+$0.05 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.14B
FCANX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCANX vs. HBLCX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCANX is a Hold and HBLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. FCANX (1.99B). HBLCX pays higher dividends than FCANX: HBLCX (2.65) vs FCANX (1.80). FCANX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FCANX (17 years) vs HBLCX (19 years). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FCANX (22.00). FCANX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: FCANX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). HBLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FCANX: HBLCX (2000) vs FCANX (500). FCANX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.42 vs. HBLCX (5.15). FCANX return over 5 years is better than : 10.98 vs. HBLCX (5.90).
| FCANX | HBLCX | FCANX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.283 | 2.083 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 1.99B | 12.1B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 2.65 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.42 | 5.15 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.77 | -0.94 | -82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.98 | 5.90 | 186% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.34 | 25.81 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers