FCAP
Price
$44.85
Change
-$1.90 (-4.06%)
Updated
Jun 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
95.66M
FULT
Price
$17.09
Change
-$0.30 (-1.73%)
Updated
Jun 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.57B
48 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCAP vs FULT

Header iconFCAP vs FULT Comparison
Open Charts FCAP vs FULTBanner chart's image
First Capital
Price$44.85
Change-$1.90 (-4.06%)
Volume$100
Capitalization95.66M
Fulton Financial
Price$17.09
Change-$0.30 (-1.73%)
Volume$41.63K
Capitalization2.57B
FCAP vs FULT Comparison Chart
Loading...
FULT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCAP vs. FULT commentary
Jun 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCAP is a Hold and FULT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 05, 2025
Stock price -- (FCAP: $46.75 vs. FULT: $17.39)
Brand notoriety: FCAP and FULT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCAP: 59% vs. FULT: 56%
Market capitalization -- FCAP: $95.66M vs. FULT: $2.57B
FCAP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $95.66M. FULT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCAP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFULT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FCAP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FULT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than FCAP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FULT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FULT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

FCAP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.59% price change this week, while FULT (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCAP is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2025.

FULT is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.28% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FULT($2.57B) has a higher market cap than FCAP($95.7M). FULT has higher P/E ratio than FCAP: FULT (9.54) vs FCAP (7.67). FCAP YTD gains are higher at: 46.074 vs. FULT (-8.896). FULT has more cash in the bank: 304M vs. FCAP (18M). FCAP has less debt than FULT: FCAP (28M) vs FULT (1.64B). FULT has higher revenues than FCAP: FULT (1.08B) vs FCAP (42.9M).
FCAPFULTFCAP / FULT
Capitalization95.7M2.57B4%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD46.074-8.896-518%
P/E Ratio7.679.5480%
Revenue42.9M1.08B4%
Total Cash18M304M6%
Total Debt28M1.64B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCAP vs FULT: Fundamental Ratings
FCAP
FULT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7060
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8436
SMR RATING
1..100
228
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3961
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1453
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULT's Valuation (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCAP (79) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to FCAP’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCAP (84) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCAP’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's SMR Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCAP (22) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to FCAP’s over the last 12 months.

FCAP's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as FULT (61) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FCAP’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

FCAP's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FULT (53) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FCAP’s stock grew somewhat faster than FULT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FULT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FMMMX43.990.28
+0.64%
American Funds AMCAP 529-F-2
TBDQX19.710.11
+0.56%
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth R6
DLDRX41.22N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Natural Resources I
SPISX63.84N/A
N/A
Invesco S&P 500 Index R6
ETAEX13.05N/A
N/A
Eventide Exponential Technologies A

FCAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FCAP and UBFO have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCAP and UBFO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCAP
1D Price
Change %
FCAP100%
-1.88%
UBFO - FCAP
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
OPHC - FCAP
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
LNKB - FCAP
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
NIC - FCAP
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
FULT - FCAP
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.87%
More

FULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with HWC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then HWC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULT
1D Price
Change %
FULT100%
+1.87%
HWC - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
+1.55%
FFBC - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
TRMK - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
+1.28%
ASB - FULT
87%
Closely correlated
+1.39%
BHLB - FULT
87%
Closely correlated
+2.33%
More