FCAP
Price
$48.06
Change
+$2.95 (+6.54%)
Updated
May 1 closing price
Capitalization
95.66M
FULT
Price
$16.91
Change
+$0.23 (+1.38%)
Updated
May 1 closing price
Capitalization
2.57B
81 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FCAP vs FULT

Header iconFCAP vs FULT Comparison
Open Charts FCAP vs FULTBanner chart's image
First Capital
Price$48.06
Change+$2.95 (+6.54%)
Volume$18.65K
Capitalization95.66M
Fulton Financial
Price$16.91
Change+$0.23 (+1.38%)
Volume$1.14M
Capitalization2.57B
FCAP vs FULT Comparison Chart
Loading...
FULT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCAP vs. FULT commentary
May 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCAP is a Buy and FULT is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 02, 2025
Stock price -- (FCAP: $48.06 vs. FULT: $16.91)
Brand notoriety: FCAP and FULT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCAP: 230% vs. FULT: 73%
Market capitalization -- FCAP: $95.66M vs. FULT: $2.57B
FCAP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $95.66M. FULT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCAP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFULT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FCAP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FULT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than FCAP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FULT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FULT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

FCAP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.66% price change this week, while FULT (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCAP is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2025.

FULT is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.04% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FULT($2.57B) has a higher market cap than FCAP($95.7M). FULT has higher P/E ratio than FCAP: FULT (9.54) vs FCAP (7.67). FCAP YTD gains are higher at: 50.167 vs. FULT (-11.411). FULT has more cash in the bank: 304M vs. FCAP (18M). FCAP has less debt than FULT: FCAP (28M) vs FULT (1.64B). FULT has higher revenues than FCAP: FULT (1.08B) vs FCAP (42.9M).
FCAPFULTFCAP / FULT
Capitalization95.7M2.57B4%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD50.167-11.411-440%
P/E Ratio7.679.5480%
Revenue42.9M1.08B4%
Total Cash18M304M6%
Total Debt28M1.64B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCAP vs FULT: Fundamental Ratings
FCAP
FULT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3214
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10036
SMR RATING
1..100
228
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3660
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1253
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULT's Valuation (34) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCAP (80) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCAP’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCAP (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCAP’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's SMR Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCAP (22) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to FCAP’s over the last 12 months.

FCAP's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as FULT (60) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FCAP’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

FCAP's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FULT (53) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FCAP’s stock grew somewhat faster than FULT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FULT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RAEFX41.060.32
+0.79%
American Funds AMCAP R5E
PMPCX14.360.08
+0.56%
Putnam Sustainable Future C
BRKCX14.140.05
+0.35%
MFS Blended Research Em Mkts Eq C
GSURX56.32N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs US Equity Insights R
TGIRX29.30-0.05
-0.17%
Thornburg International Equity R6

FCAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FCAP and OPHC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCAP and OPHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCAP
1D Price
Change %
FCAP100%
+6.54%
OPHC - FCAP
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.29%
LNKB - FCAP
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.28%
NIC - FCAP
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
FULT - FCAP
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
LCNB - FCAP
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.33%
More

FULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with FRME. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then FRME could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULT
1D Price
Change %
FULT100%
+1.38%
FRME - FULT
86%
Closely correlated
+0.79%
ASB - FULT
85%
Closely correlated
+1.86%
HWC - FULT
85%
Closely correlated
+1.19%
FFBC - FULT
85%
Closely correlated
+0.82%
NWBI - FULT
84%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
More