FCAP
Price
$37.00
Change
-$0.38 (-1.02%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
124.15M
HFBL
Price
$13.42
Change
+$0.10 (+0.75%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
41.4M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCAP vs HFBL

Header iconFCAP vs HFBL Comparison
Open Charts FCAP vs HFBLBanner chart's image
First Capital
Price$37.00
Change-$0.38 (-1.02%)
Volume$6.1K
Capitalization124.15M
Home Federal Ban
Price$13.42
Change+$0.10 (+0.75%)
Volume$2.53K
Capitalization41.4M
FCAP vs HFBL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FCAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HFBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCAP vs. HFBL commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCAP is a Hold and HFBL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (FCAP: $37.00 vs. HFBL: $13.42)
Brand notoriety: FCAP and HFBL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCAP: 36% vs. HFBL: 63%
Market capitalization -- FCAP: $124.15M vs. HFBL: $41.4M
FCAP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $124.15M. HFBL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $41.4M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCAP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHFBL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FCAP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HFBL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCAP is a better buy in the long-term than HFBL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCAP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HFBL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCAP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HFBL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HFBL is a better buy in the short-term than FCAP.

Price Growth

FCAP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.85% price change this week, while HFBL (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.87%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.72% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCAP($124M) has a higher market cap than HFBL($41.4M). HFBL has higher P/E ratio than FCAP: HFBL (10.57) vs FCAP (9.41). FCAP YTD gains are higher at: 16.336 vs. HFBL (10.242). FCAP has more cash in the bank: 26M vs. HFBL (8.24M). HFBL has less debt than FCAP: HFBL (4M) vs FCAP (33.6M). FCAP has higher revenues than HFBL: FCAP (44.4M) vs HFBL (19.8M).
FCAPHFBLFCAP / HFBL
Capitalization124M41.4M300%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.33610.242160%
P/E Ratio9.4110.5789%
Revenue44.4M19.8M224%
Total Cash26M8.24M315%
Total Debt33.6M4M840%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCAP vs HFBL: Fundamental Ratings
FCAP
HFBL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1233
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10077
SMR RATING
1..100
5574
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6055
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4363
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HFBL's Valuation (28) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FCAP (50) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that HFBL’s stock grew similarly to FCAP’s over the last 12 months.

HFBL's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FCAP (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that HFBL’s stock grew similarly to FCAP’s over the last 12 months.

FCAP's SMR Rating (55) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as HFBL (74) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FCAP’s stock grew similarly to HFBL’s over the last 12 months.

HFBL's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FCAP (60) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that HFBL’s stock grew similarly to FCAP’s over the last 12 months.

FCAP's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as HFBL (63) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FCAP’s stock grew similarly to HFBL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCAPHFBL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HFBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IPXHF15.401.37
+9.76%
Inpex Corp.
TCVNF0.670.01
+2.22%
Tocvan Ventures Corp.
MRINQ0.64N/A
N/A
Marin Software Inc.
SNOTF0.51N/A
N/A
Sinotrans Ltd.
VGLIF1.35N/A
N/A
Vista Group International Ltd.

HFBL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HFBL and FUSB have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HFBL and FUSB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HFBL
1D Price
Change %
HFBL100%
+0.75%
FUSB - HFBL
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.06%
BCAL - HFBL
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
FCAP - HFBL
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.02%
OVBC - HFBL
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
CCNEP - HFBL
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.95%
More