FCAP
Price
$40.90
Change
-$0.08 (-0.20%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
137.22M
LARK
Price
$26.71
Change
+$0.20 (+0.75%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
154.47M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCAP vs LARK

Header iconFCAP vs LARK Comparison
Open Charts FCAP vs LARKBanner chart's image
First Capital
Price$40.90
Change-$0.08 (-0.20%)
Volume$4.69K
Capitalization137.22M
Landmark Ban
Price$26.71
Change+$0.20 (+0.75%)
Volume$5.79K
Capitalization154.47M
FCAP vs LARK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FCAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LARK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCAP vs. LARK commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCAP is a StrongBuy and LARK is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FCAP: $40.90 vs. LARK: $26.71)
Brand notoriety: FCAP and LARK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCAP: 28% vs. LARK: 25%
Market capitalization -- FCAP: $137.22M vs. LARK: $154.47M
FCAP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $137.22M. LARK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $154.47M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $170.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCAP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLARK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FCAP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LARK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LARK is a better buy in the long-term than FCAP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCAP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LARK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCAP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LARK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCAP is a better buy in the short-term than LARK.

Price Growth

FCAP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +13.61% price change this week, while LARK (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.00% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LARK($154M) has a higher market cap than FCAP($137M). FCAP has higher P/E ratio than LARK: FCAP (10.41) vs LARK (9.51). FCAP YTD gains are higher at: 28.598 vs. LARK (13.868). FCAP has less debt than LARK: FCAP (33.6M) vs LARK (177M). LARK has higher revenues than FCAP: LARK (65.4M) vs FCAP (46.1M).
FCAPLARKFCAP / LARK
Capitalization137M154M89%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD28.59813.868206%
P/E Ratio10.419.51109%
Revenue46.1M65.4M70%
Total Cash26MN/A-
Total Debt33.6M177M19%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCAP vs LARK: Fundamental Ratings
FCAP
LARK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6563
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10030
SMR RATING
1..100
5249
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5950
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3655
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
24n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LARK's Valuation (27) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FCAP (49) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that LARK’s stock grew similarly to FCAP’s over the last 12 months.

LARK's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FCAP (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that LARK’s stock grew significantly faster than FCAP’s over the last 12 months.

LARK's SMR Rating (49) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FCAP (52) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that LARK’s stock grew similarly to FCAP’s over the last 12 months.

LARK's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FCAP (59) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that LARK’s stock grew similarly to FCAP’s over the last 12 months.

FCAP's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as LARK (55) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FCAP’s stock grew similarly to LARK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCAPLARK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LARK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMTOY27.440.10
+0.36%
Sumitomo Electric Industries Ltd.
KOTMF11.95N/A
N/A
Koito Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
KMRCF7.90N/A
N/A
Komori Corp.
FTIDF0.18N/A
N/A
FTI Foodtech International, Inc.
SYHBF0.23-0.01
-3.22%
Skyharbour Resources Ltd.

FCAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FCAP and UBFO have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCAP and UBFO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCAP
1D Price
Change %
FCAP100%
-0.20%
UBFO - FCAP
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.15%
OVBC - FCAP
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.48%
NECB - FCAP
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
LARK - FCAP
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
MSBI - FCAP
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
More

LARK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LARK has been loosely correlated with UBFO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LARK jumps, then UBFO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LARK
1D Price
Change %
LARK100%
+0.75%
UBFO - LARK
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.15%
UNB - LARK
33%
Loosely correlated
-2.74%
BVFL - LARK
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
CBFV - LARK
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
FUNC - LARK
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
More