FCAP
Price
$44.85
Change
-$1.90 (-4.06%)
Updated
Jun 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
95.66M
OPHC
Price
$4.36
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 4, 04:42 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
33.75M
69 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCAP vs OPHC

Header iconFCAP vs OPHC Comparison
Open Charts FCAP vs OPHCBanner chart's image
First Capital
Price$44.85
Change-$1.90 (-4.06%)
Volume$100
Capitalization95.66M
OptimumBank Holdings
Price$4.36
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$209
Capitalization33.75M
FCAP vs OPHC Comparison Chart
Loading...
OPHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCAP vs. OPHC commentary
Jun 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCAP is a Hold and OPHC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 05, 2025
Stock price -- (FCAP: $46.75 vs. OPHC: $4.36)
Brand notoriety: FCAP and OPHC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCAP: 59% vs. OPHC: 51%
Market capitalization -- FCAP: $95.66M vs. OPHC: $33.75M
FCAP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $95.66M. OPHC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $33.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCAP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOPHC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FCAP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OPHC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCAP is a better buy in the long-term than OPHC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OPHC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • OPHC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

FCAP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.59% price change this week, while OPHC (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCAP is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2025.

OPHC is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.28% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCAP($95.7M) has a higher market cap than OPHC($33.8M). FCAP has higher P/E ratio than OPHC: FCAP (7.67) vs OPHC (4.74). FCAP YTD gains are higher at: 46.074 vs. OPHC (-8.403). FCAP has less debt than OPHC: FCAP (28M) vs OPHC (64.2M). FCAP has higher revenues than OPHC: FCAP (42.9M) vs OPHC (27.2M).
FCAPOPHCFCAP / OPHC
Capitalization95.7M33.8M283%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD46.074-8.403-548%
P/E Ratio7.674.74162%
Revenue42.9M27.2M158%
Total Cash18MN/A-
Total Debt28M64.2M44%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCAP vs OPHC: Fundamental Ratings
FCAP
OPHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7086
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8456
SMR RATING
1..100
2220
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3958
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1481
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OPHC's Valuation (11) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FCAP (79) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that OPHC’s stock grew significantly faster than FCAP’s over the last 12 months.

OPHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCAP (84) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that OPHC’s stock grew similarly to FCAP’s over the last 12 months.

OPHC's SMR Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCAP (22) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that OPHC’s stock grew similarly to FCAP’s over the last 12 months.

FCAP's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as OPHC (58) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FCAP’s stock grew similarly to OPHC’s over the last 12 months.

FCAP's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for OPHC (81) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FCAP’s stock grew significantly faster than OPHC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OPHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OPHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MUECX32.77N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Core Equity C
MGFAX9.37N/A
N/A
MassMutual Global A
CLWFX75.90N/A
N/A
Columbia Large Cap Growth Inst2
FLAPX18.99N/A
N/A
Fidelity Flex Mid Cap Index
BSDAX12.87N/A
N/A
BlackRock SMID-Cap Growth Equity Inv A

FCAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FCAP and UBFO have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCAP and UBFO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCAP
1D Price
Change %
FCAP100%
-1.88%
UBFO - FCAP
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
OPHC - FCAP
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
LNKB - FCAP
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
NIC - FCAP
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
FULT - FCAP
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.87%
More

OPHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OPHC and LSBK have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OPHC and LSBK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OPHC
1D Price
Change %
OPHC100%
-0.91%
LSBK - OPHC
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
PDLB - OPHC
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
CFBK - OPHC
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
USCB - OPHC
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
AUB - OPHC
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.85%
More