FCAP
Price
$34.70
Change
-$1.30 (-3.61%)
Updated
Aug 7, 02:54 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
95.66M
SOMC
Price
$23.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
84.27M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCAP vs SOMC

Header iconFCAP vs SOMC Comparison
Open Charts FCAP vs SOMCBanner chart's image
First Capital
Price$34.70
Change-$1.30 (-3.61%)
Volume$279
Capitalization95.66M
Southern Michigan Ban
Price$23.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization84.27M
FCAP vs SOMC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FCAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SOMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCAP vs. SOMC commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCAP is a Hold and SOMC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FCAP: $36.00 vs. SOMC: $23.25)
Brand notoriety: FCAP and SOMC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCAP: 33% vs. SOMC: 64%
Market capitalization -- FCAP: $95.66M vs. SOMC: $84.27M
FCAP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $95.66M. SOMC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $84.27M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCAP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSOMC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FCAP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SOMC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SOMC is a better buy in the long-term than FCAP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCAP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SOMC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCAP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SOMC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FCAP and SOMC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FCAP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.97% price change this week, while SOMC (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.12% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCAP($95.7M) has a higher market cap than SOMC($84.3M). SOMC YTD gains are higher at: 23.688 vs. FCAP (13.192). FCAP has more cash in the bank: 18M vs. SOMC (5.8M). FCAP has less debt than SOMC: FCAP (28M) vs SOMC (33.7M). FCAP has higher revenues than SOMC: FCAP (42.9M) vs SOMC (31.2M).
FCAPSOMCFCAP / SOMC
Capitalization95.7M84.3M114%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.19223.68856%
P/E Ratio7.67N/A-
Revenue42.9M31.2M138%
Total Cash18M5.8M310%
Total Debt28M33.7M83%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCAP vs SOMC: Fundamental Ratings
FCAP
SOMC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5785
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10030
SMR RATING
1..100
545
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6341
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4775
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SOMC's Valuation (35) in the null industry is in the same range as FCAP (46) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that SOMC’s stock grew similarly to FCAP’s over the last 12 months.

SOMC's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FCAP (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that SOMC’s stock grew significantly faster than FCAP’s over the last 12 months.

SOMC's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCAP (54) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that SOMC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCAP’s over the last 12 months.

SOMC's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as FCAP (63) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that SOMC’s stock grew similarly to FCAP’s over the last 12 months.

FCAP's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as SOMC (75) in the null industry. This means that FCAP’s stock grew similarly to SOMC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCAPSOMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
42%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SOMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HAIVF3.510.16
+4.78%
HAIVISION SYS INC .
FZMD0.10N/A
N/A
Fuse Medical, Inc.
JEHLY27.92N/A
N/A
Johnson Electric Holdings Ltd.
SEBYF93.30N/A
N/A
SEB S.A.
TKOMF41.96-1.50
-3.45%
Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc.

FCAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCAP has been loosely correlated with UBFO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCAP jumps, then UBFO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCAP
1D Price
Change %
FCAP100%
-1.77%
UBFO - FCAP
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
OVBC - FCAP
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
CFFI - FCAP
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
OPHC - FCAP
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.22%
LARK - FCAP
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.30%
More

SOMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SOMC and FCAP have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SOMC and FCAP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOMC
1D Price
Change %
SOMC100%
N/A
FCAP - SOMC
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.77%
FFMR - SOMC
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGBLY - SOMC
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
SUTNY - SOMC
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
SRNN - SOMC
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More