FCAP
Price
$47.65
Change
-$1.49 (-3.03%)
Updated
Jun 2 closing price
Capitalization
95.66M
SOMC
Price
$20.35
Change
+$0.20 (+0.99%)
Updated
May 29 closing price
Capitalization
84.27M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCAP vs SOMC

Header iconFCAP vs SOMC Comparison
Open Charts FCAP vs SOMCBanner chart's image
First Capital
Price$47.65
Change-$1.49 (-3.03%)
Volume$9.02K
Capitalization95.66M
Southern Michigan Ban
Price$20.35
Change+$0.20 (+0.99%)
Volume$7.4K
Capitalization84.27M
FCAP vs SOMC Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCAP vs. SOMC commentary
Jun 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCAP is a StrongBuy and SOMC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 03, 2025
Stock price -- (FCAP: $47.65 vs. SOMC: $20.35)
Brand notoriety: FCAP and SOMC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCAP: 81% vs. SOMC: 297%
Market capitalization -- FCAP: $95.66M vs. SOMC: $84.27M
FCAP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $95.66M. SOMC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $84.27M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCAP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSOMC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FCAP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SOMC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SOMC is a better buy in the long-term than FCAP.

Price Growth

FCAP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.17% price change this week, while SOMC (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCAP is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2025.

SOMC is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.46% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCAP($95.7M) has a higher market cap than SOMC($84.3M). FCAP YTD gains are higher at: 48.871 vs. SOMC (7.449). FCAP has more cash in the bank: 18M vs. SOMC (5.8M). FCAP has less debt than SOMC: FCAP (28M) vs SOMC (33.7M). FCAP has higher revenues than SOMC: FCAP (42.9M) vs SOMC (31.2M).
FCAPSOMCFCAP / SOMC
Capitalization95.7M84.3M114%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD48.8717.449656%
P/E Ratio7.67N/A-
Revenue42.9M31.2M138%
Total Cash18M5.8M310%
Total Debt28M33.7M83%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCAP vs SOMC: Fundamental Ratings
FCAP
SOMC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7550
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8135
SMR RATING
1..100
1008
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3844
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10072
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SOMC's Valuation (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCAP (81) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that SOMC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCAP’s over the last 12 months.

SOMC's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCAP (81) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that SOMC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCAP’s over the last 12 months.

SOMC's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FCAP (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that SOMC’s stock grew significantly faster than FCAP’s over the last 12 months.

FCAP's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as SOMC (44) in the null industry. This means that FCAP’s stock grew similarly to SOMC’s over the last 12 months.

SOMC's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as FCAP (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that SOMC’s stock grew similarly to FCAP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WBX0.360.02
+5.34%
Wallbox NV
ACCO3.59N/A
N/A
Acco Brands Corp
ALV102.82-1.83
-1.75%
Autoliv
PARR21.59-0.41
-1.86%
Par Pacific Holdings
KRNT21.80-0.54
-2.42%
Kornit Digital Ltd

FCAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FCAP and UBFO have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCAP and UBFO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCAP
1D Price
Change %
FCAP100%
-3.04%
UBFO - FCAP
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
OPHC - FCAP
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.00%
LNKB - FCAP
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.02%
NIC - FCAP
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.49%
FULT - FCAP
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
More

SOMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SOMC and FCAP have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SOMC and FCAP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOMC
1D Price
Change %
SOMC100%
N/A
FCAP - SOMC
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.36%
FFMR - SOMC
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
SGBLY - SOMC
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
SUTNY - SOMC
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
SRNN - SOMC
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More