Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCAVX vs MSCCX
FCAVX vs MSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FCAVX vs MSCCX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income Adv
Price$6.65
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.77B
NYLI MacKay California Muni
Price$9.46
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
FCAVX vs MSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCAVX vs. MSCCX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCAVX is a Hold and MSCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCAVX has more cash in the bank: 12.8B vs. MSCCX (1.3B). FCAVX pays higher dividends than MSCCX: FCAVX (3.91) vs MSCCX (3.28). FCAVX was incepted earlier than MSCCX: FCAVX (24 years) vs MSCCX (13 years). MSCCX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FCAVX (0.51). MSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FCAVX (7.96). FCAVX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSCCX: FCAVX (0) vs MSCCX (2500). MSCCX (-0.73) and FCAVX (-0.75) have marching annual gain over last year. MSCCX return over 5 years is better than : 0.04 vs. FCAVX (-2.00).
| FCAVX | MSCCX | FCAVX / MSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.03 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.04 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.083 | -0.485 | -17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.8B | 1.3B | 987% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.91 | 3.28 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.75 | -0.73 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.39 | 10.08 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.00 | 0.04 | -5,242% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.19 | 21.46 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers