Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCBFX vs PBDAX
FCBFX vs PBDAX Comparison
Open Charts FCBFX vs PBDAX
Fidelity Corporate Bond
Price$10.86
Change+$0.02 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.14B
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond A
Price$9.26
Change+$0.02 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.88B
FCBFX vs PBDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCBFX vs. PBDAX commentary
Oct 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCBFX is a Hold and PBDAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBDAX has more cash in the bank: 12.9B vs. FCBFX (2.14B). PBDAX (4.21) and FCBFX (4.02) have matching dividends . FCBFX was incepted earlier than PBDAX: FCBFX (15 years) vs PBDAX (21 years). PBDAX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FCBFX (0.45). PBDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 270.00 vs. FCBFX (30.00). FCBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PBDAX: FCBFX (0) vs PBDAX (1000). PBDAX (6.01) and FCBFX (5.96) have marching annual gain over last year. FCBFX return over 5 years is better than : 1.01 vs. PBDAX (0.07).
| FCBFX | PBDAX | FCBFX / PBDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.35 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.35 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.407 | 7.361 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.14B | 12.9B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.02 | 4.21 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.96 | 6.01 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.11 | 24.79 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.01 | 0.07 | 1,436% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.61 | 28.37 | 126% |