Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCBFX vs PBDAX
FCBFX vs PBDAX Comparison
Open Charts FCBFX vs PBDAX
Fidelity Corporate Bond
Price$10.84
Change+$0.03 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond A
Price$9.22
Change-$0.02 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.45B
FCBFX vs PBDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCBFX vs. PBDAX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCBFX is a Hold and PBDAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBDAX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. FCBFX (2.07B). PBDAX (4.21) and FCBFX (4.05) have matching dividends . FCBFX was incepted earlier than PBDAX: FCBFX (15 years) vs PBDAX (21 years). PBDAX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FCBFX (0.45). PBDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 270.00 vs. FCBFX (30.00). FCBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PBDAX: FCBFX (0) vs PBDAX (1000). PBDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.24 vs. FCBFX (3.61). FCBFX return over 5 years is better than : -0.57 vs. PBDAX (-0.66).
| FCBFX | PBDAX | FCBFX / PBDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.35 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.35 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.755 | 6.990 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 12.5B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.05 | 4.21 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.61 | 4.24 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.92 | 17.71 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.57 | -0.66 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.40 | 28.44 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement