Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCBFX vs PCNNX
FCBFX vs PCNNX Comparison
Open Charts FCBFX vs PCNNX
Fidelity Corporate Bond
Price$10.84
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.14B
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond I-3
Price$9.24
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.88B
FCBFX vs PCNNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCBFX vs. PCNNX commentary
Oct 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCBFX is a Hold and PCNNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCNNX has more cash in the bank: 12.9B vs. FCBFX (2.14B). PCNNX pays higher dividends than FCBFX: PCNNX (4.46) vs FCBFX (4.02). FCBFX was incepted earlier than PCNNX: FCBFX (15 years) vs PCNNX (7 years). PCNNX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FCBFX (0.45). PCNNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 270.00 vs. FCBFX (30.00). FCBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCNNX: FCBFX (0) vs PCNNX (1000000). PCNNX (6.05) and FCBFX (5.76) have marching annual gain over last year. PCNNX return over 5 years is better than : 0.95 vs. FCBFX (0.76).
| FCBFX | PCNNX | FCBFX / PCNNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.10 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.15 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.308 | 7.445 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.14B | 12.9B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.02 | 4.46 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.76 | 6.05 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.00 | 25.59 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.76 | 0.95 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement