Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCBFX vs PCNNX
FCBFX vs PCNNX Comparison
Open Charts FCBFX vs PCNNX
Fidelity Corporate Bond
Price$10.81
Change-$0.02 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond I-3
Price$9.22
Change-$0.02 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.45B
FCBFX vs PCNNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCBFX vs. PCNNX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCBFX is a Hold and PCNNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCNNX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. FCBFX (2.07B). PCNNX pays higher dividends than FCBFX: PCNNX (4.46) vs FCBFX (4.05). FCBFX was incepted earlier than PCNNX: FCBFX (15 years) vs PCNNX (7 years). PCNNX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FCBFX (0.45). PCNNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 270.00 vs. FCBFX (30.00). FCBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCNNX: FCBFX (0) vs PCNNX (1000000). PCNNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.50 vs. FCBFX (3.99). PCNNX return over 5 years is better than : 0.59 vs. FCBFX (-0.31).
| FCBFX | PCNNX | FCBFX / PCNNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.10 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.15 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.952 | 7.168 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 12.5B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.05 | 4.46 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.99 | 4.50 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.14 | 18.60 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.31 | 0.59 | -53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.65 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement