Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCBSX vs JVMCX
FCBSX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FCBSX vs JVMCX
Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value C
Price$34.29
Change+$0.21 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets751M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.55
Change+$0.12 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.74B
FCBSX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCBSX vs. JVMCX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCBSX is a Hold and JVMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. FCBSX (751M). FCBSX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FCBSX (0.44) vs JVMCX (0.00). FCBSX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FCBSX (25 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FCBSX (1.67). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FCBSX (37.84). FCBSX (1000) and JVMCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCBSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.41 vs. JVMCX (-6.86). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.26 vs. FCBSX (26.75).
| FCBSX | JVMCX | FCBSX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 1.85 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.86 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.934 | 8.419 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 751M | 23.7B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.41 | -6.86 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.98 | 21.07 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.75 | 40.26 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.72 | 37.86 | -26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement