Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCBSX vs JVMRX
FCBSX vs JVMRX Comparison
Open Charts FCBSX vs JVMRX
Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value C
Price$33.74
Change-$0.45 (-1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets755.51M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$29.09
Change-$0.12 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23B
FCBSX vs JVMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCBSX vs. JVMRX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCBSX is a Buy and JVMRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 23B vs. FCBSX (756M). JVMRX pays higher dividends than FCBSX: JVMRX (0.86) vs FCBSX (0.45). FCBSX was incepted earlier than JVMRX: FCBSX (24 years) vs JVMRX (14 years). FCBSX (1.67) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.76). JVMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FCBSX (37.84). FCBSX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: FCBSX (1000) vs JVMRX (1000000). FCBSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.83 vs. JVMRX (-2.02). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 56.80 vs. FCBSX (34.37).
| FCBSX | JVMRX | FCBSX / JVMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.75 | 220% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.76 | 220% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.270 | 8.426 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 756M | 23B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.86 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.83 | -2.02 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.33 | 16.49 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.37 | 56.80 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | -10.24 | 47.69 | -21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement