Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCBSX vs JVMRX
FCBSX vs JVMRX Comparison
Open Charts FCBSX vs JVMRX
Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value C
Price$34.29
Change+$0.21 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets751M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$29.59
Change+$0.13 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.74B
FCBSX vs JVMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCBSX vs. JVMRX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCBSX is a Hold and JVMRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. FCBSX (751M). JVMRX pays higher dividends than FCBSX: JVMRX (0.84) vs FCBSX (0.44). FCBSX was incepted earlier than JVMRX: FCBSX (25 years) vs JVMRX (14 years). FCBSX (1.67) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.75). JVMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FCBSX (37.84). FCBSX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: FCBSX (1000) vs JVMRX (1000000). JVMRX (-5.21) and FCBSX (-5.41) have marching annual gain over last year. JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 47.28 vs. FCBSX (26.75).
| FCBSX | JVMRX | FCBSX / JVMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.74 | 223% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.75 | 223% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.934 | 9.354 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 751M | 23.7B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.84 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.41 | -5.21 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.98 | 25.07 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.75 | 47.28 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.72 | 51.73 | -19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement