FCCO
Price
$24.86
Change
+$0.17 (+0.69%)
Updated
Aug 6, 04:24 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
132.97M
77 days until earnings call
FRAF
Price
$39.20
Change
+$0.03 (+0.08%)
Updated
Aug 6, 03:29 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
113.45M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCCO vs FRAF

Header iconFCCO vs FRAF Comparison
Open Charts FCCO vs FRAFBanner chart's image
First Community
Price$24.86
Change+$0.17 (+0.69%)
Volume$100
Capitalization132.97M
Franklin Financial Services
Price$39.20
Change+$0.03 (+0.08%)
Volume$100
Capitalization113.45M
FCCO vs FRAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FCCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCCO vs. FRAF commentary
Aug 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCCO is a Hold and FRAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FCCO: $24.69 vs. FRAF: $39.17)
Brand notoriety: FCCO and FRAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCCO: 64% vs. FRAF: 41%
Market capitalization -- FCCO: $132.97M vs. FRAF: $113.45M
FCCO [@Regional Banks] is valued at $132.97M. FRAF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $113.45M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCCO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFRAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FCCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FRAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRAF is a better buy in the long-term than FCCO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCCO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRAF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCCO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FRAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCCO is a better buy in the short-term than FRAF.

Price Growth

FCCO (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.15% price change this week, while FRAF (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCCO is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

FRAF is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCCO($133M) has a higher market cap than FRAF($113M). FCCO has higher P/E ratio than FRAF: FCCO (11.14) vs FRAF (8.33). FRAF YTD gains are higher at: 34.377 vs. FCCO (4.805). FCCO has more cash in the bank: 27.8M vs. FRAF (20.1M). FCCO has less debt than FRAF: FCCO (108M) vs FRAF (154M). FRAF has higher revenues than FCCO: FRAF (67.3M) vs FCCO (54.5M).
FCCOFRAFFCCO / FRAF
Capitalization133M113M118%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.80534.37714%
P/E Ratio11.148.33134%
Revenue54.5M67.3M81%
Total Cash27.8M20.1M138%
Total Debt108M154M70%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCCO vs FRAF: Fundamental Ratings
FCCO
FRAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7382
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2220
SMR RATING
1..100
5154
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5548
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8032
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRAF's Valuation (58) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCCO (68). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to FCCO’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCCO (22). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to FCCO’s over the last 12 months.

FCCO's SMR Rating (51) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (54). This means that FCCO’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCCO (55). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to FCCO’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCCO (80). This means that FRAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCCO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCCOFRAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SBMFF0.95N/A
N/A
Sino Biopharmaceutical Ltd.
KPTCY6.68N/A
N/A
Kansai Paint Co., Ltd.
ZDZT1.92N/A
N/A
Zhengduozhe Technology, Inc
KWTEF15.43N/A
N/A
KIWETINOHK ENERGY CORP
SNRG0.04-0.01
-22.03%
Susglobal Energy Corp.

FCCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCCO has been closely correlated with CWBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCCO jumps, then CWBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCCO
1D Price
Change %
FCCO100%
+0.12%
CWBC - FCCO
69%
Closely correlated
N/A
FIBK - FCCO
69%
Closely correlated
+1.47%
UCB - FCCO
68%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
EWBC - FCCO
68%
Closely correlated
-0.77%
BUSE - FCCO
67%
Closely correlated
+0.45%
More

FRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRAF has been loosely correlated with MRBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRAF jumps, then MRBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRAF
1D Price
Change %
FRAF100%
+0.42%
MRBK - FRAF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
FUNC - FRAF
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
WNEB - FRAF
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.02%
CWBC - FRAF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FCCO - FRAF
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
More