Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCCQX vs PYCRX
FCCQX vs PYCRX Comparison
Open Charts FCCQX vs PYCRX
Franklin CA Interm-Term Tx-Fr Inc A
Price$11.02
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.35B
Payden California Municipal Social Imp
Price$9.97
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets251.46M
FCCQX vs PYCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCCQX vs. PYCRX commentary
Oct 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCCQX is a Hold and PYCRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCCQX has more cash in the bank: 1.35B vs. PYCRX (251M). PYCRX pays higher dividends than FCCQX: PYCRX (3.48) vs FCCQX (3.11). FCCQX was incepted earlier than PYCRX: FCCQX (7 years) vs PYCRX (27 years). FCCQX (0.82) is less costly to investors than PYCRX (0.69). PYCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. FCCQX (22.85). FCCQX has a lower initial minimum investment than PYCRX: FCCQX (1000) vs PYCRX (100000). PYCRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.07 vs. FCCQX (2.54). PYCRX return over 5 years is better than : 7.10 vs. FCCQX (0.78).
| FCCQX | PYCRX | FCCQX / PYCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.45 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.69 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.888 | 3.531 | 82% |
| Front Load | 2% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.35B | 251M | 537% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.11 | 3.48 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.54 | 3.07 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.83 | 15.89 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.78 | 7.10 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 21.16 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement