Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCCTX vs TRLAX
FCCTX vs TRLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCCTX vs. TRLAX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCCTX is a Hold and TRLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCCTX has more cash in the bank: 15B vs. TRLAX (180M). TRLAX pays higher dividends than FCCTX: TRLAX (5.11) vs FCCTX (2.83). FCCTX was incepted earlier than TRLAX: FCCTX (8 years) vs TRLAX (8 years). TRLAX (0.51) is less costly to investors than FCCTX (0.30). TRLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.10 vs. FCCTX (5.00). TRLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCCTX: TRLAX (2500) vs FCCTX (1000000). FCCTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.87 vs. TRLAX (3.86). FCCTX return over 5 years is better than : 21.13 vs. TRLAX (13.69).
| FCCTX | TRLAX | FCCTX / TRLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.51 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.51 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.128 | 5.930 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15B | 180M | 8,333% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.83 | 5.11 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.87 | 3.86 | 204% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.30 | 16.41 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.13 | 13.69 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers