Ad is loading...
FCCTX vs TRLAX
FCCTX vs TRLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCCTX vs. TRLAX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCCTX is a Hold and TRLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCCTX has more cash in the bank: 14.8B vs. TRLAX (173M). TRLAX pays higher dividends than FCCTX: TRLAX (5.31) vs FCCTX (2.97). FCCTX was incepted earlier than TRLAX: FCCTX (8 years) vs TRLAX (8 years). TRLAX (0.51) is less costly to investors than FCCTX (0.30). TRLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.10 vs. FCCTX (5.00). TRLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCCTX: TRLAX (2500) vs FCCTX (1000000). FCCTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.27 vs. TRLAX (3.14). FCCTX return over 5 years is better than : 23.98 vs. TRLAX (19.97).
| FCCTX | TRLAX | FCCTX / TRLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.51 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.51 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.834 | 1.702 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.8B | 173M | 8,555% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.97 | 5.31 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.27 | 3.14 | 200% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.65 | 8.27 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.98 | 19.97 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...