FCF
Price
$15.62
Change
-$0.37 (-2.32%)
Updated
May 9, 01:54 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.42B
81 days until earnings call
IBCP
Price
$31.56
Change
-$0.32 (-1.00%)
Updated
May 9, 02:13 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
529.95M
76 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FCF vs IBCP

Header iconFCF vs IBCP Comparison
Open Charts FCF vs IBCPBanner chart's image
First Commonwealth Financial
Price$15.62
Change-$0.37 (-2.32%)
Volume$500
Capitalization1.42B
Independent Bank
Price$31.56
Change-$0.32 (-1.00%)
Volume$113
Capitalization529.95M
FCF vs IBCP Comparison Chart
Loading...
FCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IBCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCF vs. IBCP commentary
May 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCF is a StrongBuy and IBCP is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 09, 2025
Stock price -- (FCF: $15.98 vs. IBCP: $31.88)
Brand notoriety: FCF and IBCP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCF: 51% vs. IBCP: 68%
Market capitalization -- FCF: $1.42B vs. IBCP: $529.95M
FCF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.42B. IBCP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $529.95M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileIBCP’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FCF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • IBCP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCF is a better buy in the long-term than IBCP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IBCP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • IBCP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCF is a better buy in the short-term than IBCP.

Price Growth

FCF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.03% price change this week, while IBCP (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCF is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

IBCP is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.41% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCF($1.42B) has a higher market cap than IBCP($530M). FCF (8.86) and IBCP (8.82) have similar P/E ratio . FCF YTD gains are higher at: -4.833 vs. IBCP (-7.030). FCF has more cash in the bank: 123M vs. IBCP (58.6M). IBCP has less debt than FCF: IBCP (129M) vs FCF (750M). FCF has higher revenues than IBCP: FCF (482M) vs IBCP (200M).
FCFIBCPFCF / IBCP
Capitalization1.42B530M268%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-4.833-7.03069%
P/E Ratio8.868.82100%
Revenue482M200M241%
Total Cash123M58.6M210%
Total Debt750M129M581%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCF vs IBCP: Fundamental Ratings
FCF
IBCP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2620
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2316
SMR RATING
1..100
1011
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5152
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1732
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FCF's Valuation (57) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IBCP (68). This means that FCF’s stock grew similarly to IBCP’s over the last 12 months.

IBCP's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCF (23). This means that IBCP’s stock grew similarly to FCF’s over the last 12 months.

FCF's SMR Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IBCP (11). This means that FCF’s stock grew similarly to IBCP’s over the last 12 months.

FCF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IBCP (52). This means that FCF’s stock grew similarly to IBCP’s over the last 12 months.

FCF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IBCP (32). This means that FCF’s stock grew similarly to IBCP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCFIBCP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IBCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KLGCX39.070.17
+0.44%
NYLI WMC Growth Class C
FNICX28.65N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor New Insights C
MURRX23.29N/A
N/A
MFS Utilities R2
KGLAX16.98N/A
N/A
Kinetics Global Adv A
BRUHX15.29N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Value Equity I

IBCP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IBCP has been closely correlated with SBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IBCP jumps, then SBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IBCP
1D Price
Change %
IBCP100%
+2.48%
SBSI - IBCP
87%
Closely correlated
+2.05%
FMBH - IBCP
87%
Closely correlated
+2.12%
FCF - IBCP
87%
Closely correlated
+1.85%
NWBI - IBCP
86%
Closely correlated
+1.46%
PEBO - IBCP
86%
Closely correlated
+1.61%
More