Ad is loading...
FCFEX vs FSNQX
FCFEX vs FSNQX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCFEX vs. FSNQX commentary
May 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCFEX is a Hold and FSNQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSNQX has more cash in the bank: 30.3B vs. FCFEX (2.82B). FSNQX pays higher dividends than FCFEX: FSNQX (2.20) vs FCFEX (1.26). FCFEX was incepted earlier than FSNQX: FCFEX (22 years) vs FSNQX (8 years). FCFEX (1.65) is less costly to investors than FSNQX (0.56). FCFEX (16.00) and FSNQX (16.00) have comparable annual turnover. FCFEX (0) and FSNQX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSNQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.44 vs. FCFEX (5.47). FSNQX return over 5 years is better than : 25.30 vs. FCFEX (20.26).
| FCFEX | FSNQX | FCFEX / FSNQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.56 | 295% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.56 | 295% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.545 | 2.507 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.82B | 30.3B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 2.20 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.47 | 6.44 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.65 | 21.74 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.26 | 25.30 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.52 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...