Ad is loading...
FCFRX vs FFRHX
FCFRX vs FFRHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCFRX vs. FFRHX commentary
May 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCFRX is a StrongBuy and FFRHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 14.4B vs. FCFRX (1.46B). FCFRX (8.38) and FFRHX (8.12) have matching dividends . FCFRX was incepted earlier than FFRHX: FCFRX (24 years) vs FFRHX (23 years). FCFRX (1.37) is less costly to investors than FFRHX (0.73). FCFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.91 vs. FFRHX (41.00). FFRHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCFRX: FFRHX (0) vs FCFRX (1000). FFRHX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FCFRX: FFRHX (500) vs FCFRX (250). FFRHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.61 vs. FCFRX (3.80). FFRHX return over 5 years is better than : 44.87 vs. FCFRX (40.45).
| FCFRX | FFRHX | FCFRX / FFRHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.73 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.73 | 188% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.256 | -0.002 | 14,519% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | 500 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 14.4B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.38 | 8.12 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.80 | 5.61 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.29 | 22.75 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.45 | 44.87 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.86 | 55.86 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...