Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCFRX vs FFRHX
FCFRX vs FFRHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCFRX vs. FFRHX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCFRX is a StrongBuy and FFRHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 15.1B vs. FCFRX (1.47B). FCFRX (7.91) and FFRHX (7.87) have matching dividends . FCFRX was incepted earlier than FFRHX: FCFRX (24 years) vs FFRHX (23 years). FCFRX (1.37) is less costly to investors than FFRHX (0.73). FCFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.91 vs. FFRHX (41.00). FFRHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCFRX: FFRHX (0) vs FCFRX (1000). FFRHX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FCFRX: FFRHX (500) vs FCFRX (250). FFRHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.23 vs. FCFRX (6.39). FFRHX (40.93) and FCFRX (38.99) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FCFRX | FFRHX | FCFRX / FFRHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.73 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.73 | 188% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.891 | 2.590 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | 500 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 1.47B | 15.1B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.91 | 7.87 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.39 | 7.23 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.87 | 31.01 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.99 | 40.93 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.12 | 60.54 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement