FCFS
Price
$131.95
Change
+$0.23 (+0.17%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
5.75B
87 days until earnings call
GTX
Price
$9.15
Change
-$0.02 (-0.22%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.37B
3 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FCFS vs GTX

Header iconFCFS vs GTX Comparison
Open Charts FCFS vs GTXBanner chart's image
FirstCash Holdings
Price$131.95
Change+$0.23 (+0.17%)
Volume$445.15K
Capitalization5.75B
Garrett Motion
Price$9.15
Change-$0.02 (-0.22%)
Volume$1.13M
Capitalization2.37B
FCFS vs GTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
FCFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GTX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCFS vs. GTX commentary
Apr 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCFS is a StrongBuy and GTX is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FCFS: $131.95 vs. GTX: $9.15)
Brand notoriety: FCFS and GTX are both not notable
FCFS represents the Finance/Rental/Leasing, while GTX is part of the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCFS: 133% vs. GTX: 66%
Market capitalization -- FCFS: $5.75B vs. GTX: $2.37B
FCFS [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $5.75B. GTX’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $2.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.66B. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGTX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FCFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GTX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GTX is a better buy in the long-term than FCFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCFS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GTX’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GTX’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GTX is a better buy in the short-term than FCFS.

Price Growth

FCFS (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +8.65% price change this week, while GTX (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +1.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +4.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.60%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +4.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCFS is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

GTX is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+4.36% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

@Auto Parts: OEM (+4.15% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCFS($5.75B) has a higher market cap than GTX($2.37B). FCFS has higher P/E ratio than GTX: FCFS (26.15) vs GTX (10.19). FCFS YTD gains are higher at: 27.777 vs. GTX (1.981). FCFS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 907M vs. GTX (600M). GTX has more cash in the bank: 259M vs. FCFS (127M). GTX has less debt than FCFS: GTX (1.69B) vs FCFS (1.92B). GTX has higher revenues than FCFS: GTX (3.89B) vs FCFS (3.15B).
FCFSGTXFCFS / GTX
Capitalization5.75B2.37B243%
EBITDA907M600M151%
Gain YTD27.7771.9811,402%
P/E Ratio26.1510.19257%
Revenue3.15B3.89B81%
Total Cash127M259M49%
Total Debt1.92B1.69B114%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCFS vs GTX: Fundamental Ratings
FCFS
GTX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9134
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1535
SMR RATING
1..100
60100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4048
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
628
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FCFS's Valuation (50) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as GTX (50) in the null industry. This means that FCFS’s stock grew similarly to GTX’s over the last 12 months.

FCFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as GTX (35) in the null industry. This means that FCFS’s stock grew similarly to GTX’s over the last 12 months.

FCFS's SMR Rating (60) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GTX (100) in the null industry. This means that FCFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than GTX’s over the last 12 months.

FCFS's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as GTX (48) in the null industry. This means that FCFS’s stock grew similarly to GTX’s over the last 12 months.

GTX's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCFS (62) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that GTX’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCFSGTX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FCFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GTX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASPZX27.570.51
+1.88%
Alger Spectra Z
PRWCX34.520.18
+0.52%
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation
GIRNX29.610.05
+0.17%
Goldman Sachs International Eq ESG Inv
LRSSX13.21-0.02
-0.15%
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R4
JVSCX12.69-0.14
-1.09%
Janus Henderson Small-Mid Cap Value C

FCFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCFS has been loosely correlated with UPBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCFS jumps, then UPBD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCFS
1D Price
Change %
FCFS100%
+0.17%
UPBD - FCFS
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.82%
PFSI - FCFS
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.59%
EZPW - FCFS
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
ENVA - FCFS
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
SLM - FCFS
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.39%
More

GTX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTX has been loosely correlated with BWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTX jumps, then BWA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTX
1D Price
Change %
GTX100%
-0.22%
BWA - GTX
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
MGA - GTX
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
ALV - GTX
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.16%
LEA - GTX
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
LKQ - GTX
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
More