FCFS
Price
$130.47
Change
+$0.33 (+0.25%)
Updated
Jun 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.75B
30 days until earnings call
R
Price
$156.71
Change
+$2.95 (+1.92%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
5.32B
29 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCFS vs R

Header iconFCFS vs R Comparison
Open Charts FCFS vs RBanner chart's image
FirstCash Holdings
Price$130.47
Change+$0.33 (+0.25%)
Volume$3.75K
Capitalization5.75B
Ryder System
Price$156.71
Change+$2.95 (+1.92%)
Volume$308.8K
Capitalization5.32B
FCFS vs R Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FCFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCFS vs. R commentary
Jun 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCFS is a Hold and R is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 25, 2025
Stock price -- (FCFS: $130.14 vs. R: $153.76)
Brand notoriety: FCFS and R are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCFS: 73% vs. R: 62%
Market capitalization -- FCFS: $5.75B vs. R: $5.32B
FCFS [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $5.75B. R’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $5.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FCFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • R’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, R is a better buy in the long-term than FCFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCFS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while R’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • R’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCFS is a better buy in the short-term than R.

Price Growth

FCFS (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -0.22% price change this week, while R (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +2.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +2.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCFS is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

R is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+2.51% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCFS($5.75B) has a higher market cap than R($5.32B). FCFS has higher P/E ratio than R: FCFS (26.15) vs R (13.76). FCFS YTD gains are higher at: 26.397 vs. R (-0.990). R has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.73B vs. FCFS (907M). R has more cash in the bank: 204M vs. FCFS (127M). FCFS has less debt than R: FCFS (1.92B) vs R (8.15B). R has higher revenues than FCFS: R (11.8B) vs FCFS (3.15B).
FCFSRFCFS / R
Capitalization5.75B5.32B108%
EBITDA907M2.73B33%
Gain YTD26.397-0.990-2,666%
P/E Ratio26.1513.76190%
Revenue3.15B11.8B27%
Total Cash127M204M62%
Total Debt1.92B8.15B24%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCFS vs R: Fundamental Ratings
FCFS
R
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
174
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
197
SMR RATING
1..100
5752
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4450
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5171
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

R's Valuation (36) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCFS (97). This means that R’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

R's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FCFS (19). This means that R’s stock grew similarly to FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

R's SMR Rating (52) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FCFS (57). This means that R’s stock grew similarly to FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

FCFS's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as R (50). This means that FCFS’s stock grew similarly to R’s over the last 12 months.

FCFS's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as R (71). This means that FCFS’s stock grew similarly to R’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCFSR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTC146.161.08
+0.74%
First Trust Large Cap Gr AlphaDEX® ETF
SPTL26.190.12
+0.46%
SPDR® Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF
PZC6.160.02
+0.33%
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund III
VKI8.180.03
+0.31%
Invesco Advantage Municipal Income Trust II
TWM45.40-1.12
-2.41%
ProShares UltraShort Russell2000

FCFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCFS has been loosely correlated with EZPW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCFS jumps, then EZPW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCFS
1D Price
Change %
FCFS100%
+0.45%
EZPW - FCFS
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.53%
UPBD - FCFS
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
R - FCFS
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.36%
ENVA - FCFS
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
SLM - FCFS
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
More