FCFS
Price
$136.77
Change
+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
5.75B
19 days until earnings call
SLM
Price
$33.87
Change
+$0.07 (+0.21%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.8B
19 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCFS vs SLM

Header iconFCFS vs SLM Comparison
Open Charts FCFS vs SLMBanner chart's image
FirstCash Holdings
Price$136.77
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Volume$128.32K
Capitalization5.75B
SLM
Price$33.87
Change+$0.07 (+0.21%)
Volume$1.65M
Capitalization4.8B
FCFS vs SLM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FCFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCFS vs. SLM commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCFS is a Buy and SLM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (FCFS: $136.77 vs. SLM: $33.87)
Brand notoriety: FCFS: Not notable vs. SLM: Notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCFS: 44% vs. SLM: 85%
Market capitalization -- FCFS: $5.75B vs. SLM: $4.8B
FCFS [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $5.75B. SLM’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $4.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FCFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SLM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLM is a better buy in the long-term than FCFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCFS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SLM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCFS is a better buy in the short-term than SLM.

Price Growth

FCFS (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -0.62% price change this week, while SLM (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +2.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCFS is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

SLM is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+2.32% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCFS($5.75B) has a higher market cap than SLM($4.8B). FCFS has higher P/E ratio than SLM: FCFS (26.15) vs SLM (8.85). FCFS YTD gains are higher at: 32.836 vs. SLM (23.857). FCFS has less debt than SLM: FCFS (1.92B) vs SLM (5.23B). FCFS has higher revenues than SLM: FCFS (3.15B) vs SLM (1.81B).
FCFSSLMFCFS / SLM
Capitalization5.75B4.8B120%
EBITDA907MN/A-
Gain YTD32.83623.857138%
P/E Ratio26.158.85296%
Revenue3.15B1.81B174%
Total Cash127MN/A-
Total Debt1.92B5.23B37%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCFS vs SLM: Fundamental Ratings
FCFS
SLM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1816
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
178
SMR RATING
1..100
5710
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4442
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4611
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLM's Valuation (42) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCFS (97). This means that SLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

SLM's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FCFS (17). This means that SLM’s stock grew similarly to FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

SLM's SMR Rating (10) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCFS (57). This means that SLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

SLM's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FCFS (44). This means that SLM’s stock grew similarly to FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

SLM's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCFS (46). This means that SLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCFSSLM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RNGCX64.830.58
+0.90%
American Funds New Economy R3
MALRX23.28N/A
N/A
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Core Instl
VDSCX19.62N/A
N/A
Victory Diversified Stock C
TNYRX10.51N/A
N/A
1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income R
GNNDX29.87N/A
N/A
Gotham Index Plus Investor

FCFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCFS has been loosely correlated with UPBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCFS jumps, then UPBD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCFS
1D Price
Change %
FCFS100%
+0.01%
UPBD - FCFS
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
EZPW - FCFS
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.89%
R - FCFS
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.01%
BBDC - FCFS
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
SLM - FCFS
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
More