FCFS
Price
$153.39
Change
-$5.01 (-3.16%)
Updated
Oct 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.03B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
SLM
Price
$26.75
Change
+$0.67 (+2.57%)
Updated
Oct 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.44B
2 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCFS vs SLM

Header iconFCFS vs SLM Comparison
Open Charts FCFS vs SLMBanner chart's image
FirstCash Holdings
Price$153.39
Change-$5.01 (-3.16%)
Volume$2.68K
Capitalization7.03B
SLM
Price$26.75
Change+$0.67 (+2.57%)
Volume$44.81K
Capitalization5.44B
FCFS vs SLM Comparison Chart in %
FCFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCFS vs. SLM commentary
Oct 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCFS is a Hold and SLM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 21, 2025
Stock price -- (FCFS: $158.40 vs. SLM: $26.08)
Brand notoriety: FCFS: Not notable vs. SLM: Notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCFS: 59% vs. SLM: 61%
Market capitalization -- FCFS: $7.03B vs. SLM: $5.44B
FCFS [@Savings Banks] is valued at $7.03B. SLM’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $5.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $668.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCFS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSLM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FCFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SLM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLM is a better buy in the long-term than FCFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCFS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SLM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLM is a better buy in the short-term than FCFS.

Price Growth

FCFS (@Savings Banks) experienced а +3.10% price change this week, while SLM (@Savings Banks) price change was +2.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

SLM is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (+0.34% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCFS($7.03B) has a higher market cap than SLM($5.44B). FCFS has higher P/E ratio than SLM: FCFS (24.37) vs SLM (12.66). FCFS YTD gains are higher at: 54.309 vs. SLM (-4.226). FCFS has less debt than SLM: FCFS (2.02B) vs SLM (6.41B). FCFS has higher revenues than SLM: FCFS (3.39B) vs SLM (1.76B).
FCFSSLMFCFS / SLM
Capitalization7.03B5.44B129%
EBITDA969MN/A-
Gain YTD54.309-4.226-1,285%
P/E Ratio24.3712.66192%
Revenue3.39B1.76B193%
Total Cash101MN/A-
Total Debt2.02B6.41B32%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCFS vs SLM: Fundamental Ratings
FCFS
SLM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7759
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
821
SMR RATING
1..100
5711
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4363
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3210
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLM's Valuation (64) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FCFS (94). This means that SLM’s stock grew similarly to FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

FCFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as SLM (21). This means that FCFS’s stock grew similarly to SLM’s over the last 12 months.

SLM's SMR Rating (11) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCFS (57). This means that SLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

FCFS's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as SLM (63). This means that FCFS’s stock grew similarly to SLM’s over the last 12 months.

SLM's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FCFS (32). This means that SLM’s stock grew similarly to FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCFSSLM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSLEX74.800.80
+1.08%
American Funds SMALLCAP World R4
TEQCX31.30N/A
N/A
Touchstone Non-US Equity C
MMELX16.42N/A
N/A
MassMutual Mid Cap Growth Adm
JMNCX13.12N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Research Market Neutral C
FCLKX18.13N/A
N/A
Fidelity Large Cap Stock K6