Advertisement
FCFS vs TPC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCFS is a Hold and TPC is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FCFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTPC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FCFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TPC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FCFS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TPC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FCFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- TPC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FCFS (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +0.32% price change this week, while TPC (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +2.96% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +1.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.88%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.09%.
Reported Earning Dates
FCFS is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.
TPC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+1.59% weekly)A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).
@Engineering & Construction (+0.68% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| FCFS | TPC | FCFS / TPC | |
| Capitalization | 5.75B | 1.25B | 461% |
| EBITDA | 907M | 45.2B | 2% |
| Gain YTD | 24.231 | 56.364 | 43% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.15 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 3.15B | 123B | 3% |
| Total Cash | 127M | 6.89B | 2% |
| Total Debt | 1.92B | 144B | 1% |
FCFS | TPC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 97 Overvalued | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 11 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 57 | 53 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 66 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TPC's Valuation (13) in the Engineering And Construction industry is significantly better than the same rating for FCFS (97) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that TPC’s stock grew significantly faster than FCFS’s over the last 12 months.
TPC's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as FCFS (18) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that TPC’s stock grew similarly to FCFS’s over the last 12 months.
TPC's SMR Rating (53) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as FCFS (57) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that TPC’s stock grew similarly to FCFS’s over the last 12 months.
TPC's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as FCFS (48) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that TPC’s stock grew similarly to FCFS’s over the last 12 months.
FCFS's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as TPC (76) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that FCFS’s stock grew similarly to TPC’s over the last 12 months.
| FCFS | TPC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 5 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 6 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 89% |
Advertisement
FCFS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCFS has been loosely correlated with UPBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCFS jumps, then UPBD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCFS | 100% | +0.53% | ||
| UPBD - FCFS | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| EZPW - FCFS | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| R - FCFS | 40% Loosely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| ENVA - FCFS | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| SLM - FCFS | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.58% | ||
More | ||||
TPC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TPC has been loosely correlated with ROAD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TPC jumps, then ROAD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TPC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPC | 100% | -0.81% | ||
| ROAD - TPC | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.46% | ||
| MTZ - TPC | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| GLDD - TPC | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| STRL - TPC | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| PRIM - TPC | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
More | ||||