Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCFTX vs FSNKX
FCFTX vs FSNKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCFTX vs. FSNKX commentary
Aug 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCFTX is a Hold and FSNKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSNKX has more cash in the bank: 3.12B vs. FCFTX (213M). FSNKX pays higher dividends than FCFTX: FSNKX (2.95) vs FCFTX (2.50). FCFTX was incepted earlier than FSNKX: FCFTX (22 years) vs FSNKX (8 years). FCFTX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FSNKX (0.42). FCFTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FSNKX (14.00). FCFTX (0) and FSNKX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSNKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.54 vs. FCFTX (5.70). FSNKX return over 5 years is better than : 5.02 vs. FCFTX (1.51).
| FCFTX | FSNKX | FCFTX / FSNKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.42 | 229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.42 | 229% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.330 | 5.847 | 91% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 213M | 3.12B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.50 | 2.95 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.70 | 6.54 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.33 | 17.85 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.51 | 5.02 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.15 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers