Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCFTX vs FSNKX
FCFTX vs FSNKX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCFTX vs. FSNKX commentary
Jun 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCFTX is a Hold and FSNKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSNKX has more cash in the bank: 3.11B vs. FCFTX (212M). FSNKX pays higher dividends than FCFTX: FSNKX (3.02) vs FCFTX (2.55). FCFTX was incepted earlier than FSNKX: FCFTX (22 years) vs FSNKX (8 years). FCFTX (0.98) is less costly to investors than FSNKX (0.43). FCFTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. FSNKX (13.00). FCFTX (0) and FSNKX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSNKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.78 vs. FCFTX (4.97). FSNKX return over 5 years is better than : 6.71 vs. FCFTX (3.18).
| FCFTX | FSNKX | FCFTX / FSNKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.43 | 228% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.43 | 228% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.237 | 3.610 | 90% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 212M | 3.11B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.55 | 3.02 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.97 | 5.78 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.53 | 13.95 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.18 | 6.71 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.21 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers