Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCFTX vs RBATX
FCFTX vs RBATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCFTX vs. RBATX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCFTX is a Hold and RBATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBATX has more cash in the bank: 3.92B vs. FCFTX (213M). FCFTX pays higher dividends than RBATX: FCFTX (2.50) vs RBATX (2.05). FCFTX was incepted earlier than RBATX: FCFTX (22 years) vs RBATX (19 years). RBATX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FCFTX (0.96). FCFTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. RBATX (8.00). FCFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBATX: FCFTX (0) vs RBATX (250). RBATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.50 vs. FCFTX (6.86). RBATX return over 5 years is better than : 15.74 vs. FCFTX (2.32).
| FCFTX | RBATX | FCFTX / RBATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.38 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.38 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.996 | 7.592 | 79% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 213M | 3.92B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.50 | 2.05 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.86 | 7.50 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.95 | 15.49 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.32 | 15.74 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.71 | 31.09 | 9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers