Ad is loading...
FCFTX vs RBATX
FCFTX vs RBATX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCFTX vs. RBATX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCFTX is a Hold and RBATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBATX has more cash in the bank: 3.8B vs. FCFTX (211M). FCFTX pays higher dividends than RBATX: FCFTX (2.50) vs RBATX (2.14). FCFTX was incepted earlier than RBATX: FCFTX (22 years) vs RBATX (18 years). RBATX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FCFTX (0.98). FCFTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. RBATX (8.00). FCFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBATX: FCFTX (0) vs RBATX (250). FCFTX (7.94) and RBATX (7.58) have marching annual gain over last year. RBATX return over 5 years is better than : 18.95 vs. FCFTX (5.60).
| FCFTX | RBATX | FCFTX / RBATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.38 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.38 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.751 | 2.618 | 105% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 211M | 3.8B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.50 | 2.14 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.94 | 7.58 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.24 | 9.28 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.60 | 18.95 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.50 | 22.76 | -15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...