Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCFTX vs RBATX
FCFTX vs RBATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCFTX vs. RBATX commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCFTX is a Hold and RBATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBATX has more cash in the bank: 3.91B vs. FCFTX (212M). FCFTX pays higher dividends than RBATX: FCFTX (2.55) vs RBATX (2.10). FCFTX was incepted earlier than RBATX: FCFTX (22 years) vs RBATX (18 years). RBATX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FCFTX (0.96). FCFTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. RBATX (8.00). FCFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBATX: FCFTX (0) vs RBATX (250). RBATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.12 vs. FCFTX (6.41). RBATX return over 5 years is better than : 19.45 vs. FCFTX (5.70).
| FCFTX | RBATX | FCFTX / RBATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.38 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.38 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.759 | 6.457 | 74% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 212M | 3.91B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.55 | 2.10 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.41 | 8.12 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.88 | 17.30 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.70 | 19.45 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.43 | 30.22 | 5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement