Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCFTX vs RDATX
FCFTX vs RDATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCFTX vs. RDATX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCFTX is a Hold and RDATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RDATX has more cash in the bank: 3.94B vs. FCFTX (211M). RDATX pays higher dividends than FCFTX: RDATX (2.67) vs FCFTX (2.46). FCFTX was incepted earlier than RDATX: FCFTX (22 years) vs RDATX (19 years). FCFTX (0.96) is less costly to investors than RDATX (0.63). FCFTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. RDATX (8.00). FCFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDATX: FCFTX (0) vs RDATX (250). RDATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.00 vs. FCFTX (6.32). RDATX return over 5 years is better than : 21.03 vs. FCFTX (3.34).
| FCFTX | RDATX | FCFTX / RDATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.63 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.63 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.233 | 9.750 | 74% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 211M | 3.94B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.46 | 2.67 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.32 | 8.00 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.07 | 21.45 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.34 | 21.03 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.37 | 43.27 | 17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement