Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCFTX vs RDATX
FCFTX vs RDATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCFTX vs. RDATX commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCFTX is a Hold and RDATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RDATX has more cash in the bank: 3.91B vs. FCFTX (212M). RDATX pays higher dividends than FCFTX: RDATX (2.79) vs FCFTX (2.55). FCFTX was incepted earlier than RDATX: FCFTX (22 years) vs RDATX (18 years). FCFTX (0.96) is less costly to investors than RDATX (0.63). FCFTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. RDATX (8.00). FCFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDATX: FCFTX (0) vs RDATX (250). RDATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.97 vs. FCFTX (6.41). RDATX return over 5 years is better than : 23.32 vs. FCFTX (5.70).
| FCFTX | RDATX | FCFTX / RDATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.63 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.63 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.759 | 6.903 | 69% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 212M | 3.91B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.55 | 2.79 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.41 | 8.97 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.88 | 19.58 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.70 | 23.32 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.43 | 36.18 | 4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers