Ad is loading...
FCGTX vs LIKPX
FCGTX vs LIKPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. LIKPX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and LIKPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. LIKPX (12.5B). LIKPX pays higher dividends than FCGTX: LIKPX (2.19) vs FCGTX (1.60). FCGTX was incepted earlier than LIKPX: FCGTX (8 years) vs LIKPX (7 years). LIKPX (0.44) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). LIKPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 7.00 vs. FCGTX (6.00). LIKPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGTX: LIKPX (1000) vs FCGTX (1000000). LIKPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.24 vs. FCGTX (6.46). LIKPX return over 5 years is better than : 62.76 vs. FCGTX (46.33).
| FCGTX | LIKPX | FCGTX / LIKPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.39 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.44 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.222 | -2.257 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 12.5B | 342% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 2.19 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.46 | 7.24 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.39 | 17.99 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.33 | 62.76 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...