Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGTX vs NWMAX
FCGTX vs NWMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. NWMAX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and NWMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX has more cash in the bank: 49.4B vs. NWMAX (184M). NWMAX pays higher dividends than FCGTX: NWMAX (2.33) vs FCGTX (1.41). FCGTX was incepted earlier than NWMAX: FCGTX (9 years) vs NWMAX (18 years). NWMAX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). NWMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.86 vs. FCGTX (6.00). NWMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGTX: NWMAX (2000) vs FCGTX (1000000). FCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.31 vs. NWMAX (3.31). FCGTX return over 5 years is better than : 45.60 vs. NWMAX (24.83).
| FCGTX | NWMAX | FCGTX / NWMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.96 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.96 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.516 | 12.515 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.4B | 184M | 26,848% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 2.33 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.31 | 3.31 | 493% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.96 | 21.06 | 190% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.60 | 24.83 | 184% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 25.42 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement