Ad is loading...
FCGTX vs NWMAX
FCGTX vs NWMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. NWMAX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and NWMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX has more cash in the bank: 43.8B vs. NWMAX (179M). NWMAX pays higher dividends than FCGTX: NWMAX (2.46) vs FCGTX (1.60). FCGTX was incepted earlier than NWMAX: FCGTX (8 years) vs NWMAX (18 years). NWMAX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). NWMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.86 vs. FCGTX (6.00). NWMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGTX: NWMAX (2000) vs FCGTX (1000000). FCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.01 vs. NWMAX (-4.05). FCGTX return over 5 years is better than : 44.60 vs. NWMAX (25.01).
| FCGTX | NWMAX | FCGTX / NWMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.96 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.96 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.098 | -0.570 | 17% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.8B | 179M | 24,469% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 2.46 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.01 | -4.05 | -173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.08 | 3.48 | 548% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.60 | 25.01 | 178% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 2.73 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers