Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGTX vs RCKTX
FCGTX vs RCKTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. RCKTX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and RCKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX (45.4B) and RCKTX (45.4B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCGTX pays higher dividends than RCKTX: FCGTX (1.59) vs RCKTX (0.98). FCGTX was incepted earlier than RCKTX: FCGTX (8 years) vs RCKTX (18 years). RCKTX (1.00) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). FCGTX (6.00) and RCKTX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. RCKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGTX: RCKTX (250) vs FCGTX (1000000). FCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.68 vs. RCKTX (7.94). FCGTX return over 5 years is better than : 47.47 vs. RCKTX (43.95).
| FCGTX | RCKTX | FCGTX / RCKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.00 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.00 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.812 | 3.522 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.4B | 45.4B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 0.98 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.68 | 7.94 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.32 | 25.46 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.47 | 43.95 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 60.07 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement