Ad is loading...
FCGTX vs RDGTX
FCGTX vs RDGTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. RDGTX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and RDGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX (43.6B) and RDGTX (43.6B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCGTX pays higher dividends than RDGTX: FCGTX (1.60) vs RDGTX (1.26). FCGTX was incepted earlier than RDGTX: FCGTX (8 years) vs RDGTX (18 years). RDGTX (0.70) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). FCGTX (6.00) and RDGTX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. RDGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGTX: RDGTX (250) vs FCGTX (1000000). FCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.87 vs. RDGTX (6.43). FCGTX (42.97) and RDGTX (41.34) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FCGTX | RDGTX | FCGTX / RDGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.70 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.70 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.489 | -0.638 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.6B | 43.6B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 1.26 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.87 | 6.43 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.61 | 17.70 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.97 | 41.34 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 55.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...