Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGTX vs RDGTX
FCGTX vs RDGTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. RDGTX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and RDGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX (45.4B) and RDGTX (45.4B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCGTX pays higher dividends than RDGTX: FCGTX (1.59) vs RDGTX (1.25). FCGTX was incepted earlier than RDGTX: FCGTX (8 years) vs RDGTX (18 years). RDGTX (0.70) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). FCGTX (6.00) and RDGTX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. RDGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGTX: RDGTX (250) vs FCGTX (1000000). FCGTX (8.68) and RDGTX (8.31) have marching annual gain over last year. FCGTX (47.47) and RDGTX (45.65) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FCGTX | RDGTX | FCGTX / RDGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.70 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.70 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.812 | 3.631 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.4B | 45.4B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 1.25 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.68 | 8.31 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.32 | 26.33 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.47 | 45.65 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 62.28 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement