Ad is loading...
FCGTX vs RFGTX
FCGTX vs RFGTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. RFGTX commentary
Apr 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and RFGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX (43.4B) and RFGTX (43.4B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCGTX (1.60) and RFGTX (1.59) have matching dividends . FCGTX was incepted earlier than RFGTX: FCGTX (8 years) vs RFGTX (16 years). FCGTX (0.36) and RFGTX (0.36) have similar cost to investors . FCGTX (6.00) and RFGTX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. RFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGTX: RFGTX (250) vs FCGTX (1000000). RFGTX (7.35) and FCGTX (7.33) have marching annual gain over last year. RFGTX (47.10) and FCGTX (46.99) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FCGTX | RFGTX | FCGTX / RFGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.36 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.36 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.782 | -0.827 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.4B | 43.4B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 1.59 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.33 | 7.35 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.60 | 17.64 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.99 | 47.10 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 56.82 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...