Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCHKX vs GSAEX
FCHKX vs GSAEX Comparison
Open Charts FCHKX vs GSAEX
Fidelity Advisor China Region C
Price$50.57
Change-$0.18 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Goldman Sachs China Equity I
Price$28.68
Change+$0.10 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.8M
FCHKX vs GSAEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCHKX vs. GSAEX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCHKX is a Buy and GSAEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHKX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. GSAEX (40.8M). GSAEX pays higher dividends than FCHKX: GSAEX (1.21) vs FCHKX (0.50). FCHKX was incepted earlier than GSAEX: FCHKX (17 years) vs GSAEX (12 years). GSAEX (2.05) is less costly to investors than FCHKX (1.93). GSAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FCHKX (30.00). FCHKX (0) and GSAEX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GSAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.64 vs. FCHKX (39.44). FCHKX return over 5 years is better than : 11.94 vs. GSAEX (-19.39).
| FCHKX | GSAEX | FCHKX / GSAEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.21 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 2.05 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 38.661 | 35.386 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 40.8M | 3,395% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.21 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.44 | 41.64 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 83.77 | 33.96 | 247% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.94 | -19.39 | -62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.02 | 52.69 | 192% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement